Kidney Res Clin Pract > Volume 44(1); 2025 > Article
Park, Jeon, Park, Jeon, Park, Chi, Kim, Sinn, Lee, Gwak, Huh, Kim, and Jang: Clinical consequence of hypophosphatemia during antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B

Abstract

Background

Antiviral therapy is an essential treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. Although hypophosphatemia is an important adverse effect of antiviral agents, its clinical significance remains unclear. We investigated the incidence and clinical consequences of hypophosphatemia in a large cohort of CHB patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included CHB patients who started antiviral therapy between 2005 and 2015 and continued it for at least 1 year. Patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, concomitant diuretic administration, and end-stage renal disease were excluded. The primary outcome was a change in renal function. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of infection and changes in serum potassium, uric acid, and total carbon dioxide (tCO2).

Results

Among the 4,335 patients, hypophosphatemia developed in 75 (1.7%). During the median 2-year follow-up period, patients with hypophosphatemia showed a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate than those in the control group. The incidence of infection and changes in serum potassium, uric acid, and tCO2 were similar between groups.

Conclusion

Hypophosphatemia was associated with a renal function decline in patients with CHB receiving antiviral therapy.

Graphical abstract

Introduction

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is an important liver disease and a major public health concern. According to the World Health Organization, the estimated global prevalence of hepatitis B (HBV) carriers was 296 million in 2019, and 820,000 deaths globally per year were caused by HBV-related liver diseases [1]. Antiviral therapy that slows down and prevents the progression of CHB to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma is essential for patients with CHB.
The nephrotoxicity of antiviral agents was reported in previous studies [25]. The nephrotoxicity of antiviral agents is known to be mediated by various mechanisms such as transporter defects or apoptosis of the renal tubular epithelium, vascular injury, and mitochondrial injury. Fanconi syndrome, characterized by hypouricemia, hypokalemia, and metabolic acidosis, is caused by antiviral agent-induced dysfunction of the proximal tubule [6,7]. Proximal tubular damage induced by antiviral agents might be related to hypophosphatemia because 75% to 85% of the filtered phosphate is reabsorbed in the renal proximal convoluted tubules [8]. However, the precise clinical association between antiviral agent-induced hypophosphatemia and renal function decline or Fanconi feature tubulopathy has yet to be reported.
Serum phosphate is a fundamental element related to skeletal development, membrane composition, nucleotide structure, and cellular signaling [9]. Hypophosphatemia may affect the hematopoietic system by decreasing the intracellular adenosine triphosphate and suppressing phagocytosis and chemotaxis of granulocytes [10]. Nevertheless, the clinical significance of antiviral agent-induced hypophosphatemia in real-world practice remains unclear.
This study aimed to investigate the incidence and clinical consequences of hypophosphatemia in a large cohort of CHB patients without well-known risk factors for renal insufficiency.

Methods

Study population

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. The data was collected from the medical records of 16,829 CHB patients who received antiviral therapy for at least 1 year from 2005 to 2015 at the Samsung Medical Center, a 2,157-bed tertiary hospital in Seoul, South Korea (Fig. 1). All patients were over 18 years of age. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, end-stage renal disease, decompensated liver cirrhosis (defined as the presence of ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome, portopulmonary hypertension, and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy), and concomitant diuretic administration were excluded to minimize the confounding effects of these well-known risk factors for renal insufficiency [11]. The antiviral agents used included lamivudine, entecavir, adefovir, tenofovir, telbivudine, and clevudine.
The study protocol was in compliance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center (No. 2019-11-055-002), which waived the need for informed consent owing to its retrospective nature.

Variables

After starting the antiviral agents, the patients were followed up for 1 to 5 years. Demographic variables (age, sex, and race) and laboratory variables, including serum phosphate, potassium, creatinine, uric acid, and total carbon dioxide (tCO2) levels, were collected. All serum phosphate levels from the initiation of antiviral agents (baseline) to the last follow-up were serially assessed. Hypophosphatemia was defined as a median serum phosphate level ≤2.5 mg/dL during the follow-up period. To compare the nutritional status of the patients, their body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Malnutrition was defined as a BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was changes in the renal function as evaluated by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. The secondary outcomes were changes in serum potassium, uric acid, and tCO2 levels. To determine the effect of hypophosphatemia on infection, the incidence of infections requiring antibiotics was analyzed.

Statistical analyses

Continuous measures are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, while skewed data are expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables are expressed as proportional numbers, and the chi-square test was used to assess the differences between them. The Wilcoxon signed-rank and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to examine non-normally distributed categorical variables.
Because unbalanced, repeated-measured data was collected, the linear mixed model was used to determine the relationship between the serum phosphate levels and changes in eGFR. Serum phosphate level, age, and baseline serum creatinine level were included as fixed effects. To test for the significance of each fixed effect specified in the model, type III tests were performed. The significance was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Corp.), SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute), and R version 3.4.4 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 4,335 patients were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up period was 6.7 years. The median age was 51 years (IQR, 42–59 years); 71.1% of the patients were men. The prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma was 65.4% (2,835 of 4,335 patients). The median baseline serum creatinine level was 0.8 mg/dL (IQR, 0.7–0.9 mg/dL). The median baseline eGFR was 97 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR, 87.7–105.3 mL/min/1.73 m2), estimated by the CKD-EPI equation, and 90.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR, 80.5–101.2 mL/min/1.73 m2), estimated by the modified MDRD equation. The mean BMI of patients was 23.85 kg/m2.
Hypophosphatemia developed in 1.7% (75 of 4,335) of all patients. Those in the hypophosphatemia group were older and had higher baseline serum creatinine levels than those in the control group (Table 1). The percentages of patients with a BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2 were 2.7% (2 of 75 patients) in the hypophosphatemia group and 1.7% (72 of 4,260 patients) in the control group, there were no significant differences (p = 0.37).

Changes in renal function according to serum phosphate levels

There was a significant intergroup difference in renal function for up to 24 months. The mean CKD-EPI eGFR at 6 months after antiviral agent initiation was 94.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 86.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the control and hypophosphatemia groups, respectively. At 24 months after antiviral agent initiation, the median eGFR was 89.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 79.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the control and hypophosphatemia groups, respectively. Renal function was significantly decreased in the hypophosphatemia group at all time points during the follow-up period (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2). To compare the changes in eGFR over time between the groups, a linear mixed model was used. As shown in Table 2, statistical analysis using a linear mixed model revealed a significant independent effect of serum phosphate (group) on eGFR, such that the hypophosphatemia group had a lower eGFR (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the degree of eGFR change between the groups over time (p = 0.57), indicating no interaction between the main characteristics of the groups. Although the patients in the hypophosphatemia group patients were older and had a lower baseline eGFR, as evidenced by the significantly higher serum creatinine levels and age at the initiation of antiviral agents (p < 0.001), this disparity did not increase over the 2 years of follow-up (Table 2). After adjusting for serum baseline creatinine level, time, and age, the hypophosphatemia group had a lower eGFR than the control group in all the follow-up periods (Fig. 3).

Subgroup analysis according to the antiviral agent

Subgroup analyses were performed using a linear mixed model according to the antiviral agents (Table 3). There were no significant independent effects in the lamivudine, entecavir, and adefovir groups. However, the tenofovir group showed a significant independent effect on eGFR (p = 0.04).

Comparison of changes in serum potassium, uric acid, and tCO2 levels

For the 2 years of follow-up, no significant differences in serum potassium, uric acid, and tCO2 levels were noted between the control and hypophosphatemia groups (Fig. 4).

Incidence of infection

During the entire follow-up period, antibiotics were prescribed to 64.7% (2,756 of 4,260) of the patients from the control group and 62.7% (47 of 75) of the patients from the hypophosphatemia group. The incidence of infection requiring antibiotics was comparable between the control and hypophosphatemia groups (p = 0.72).

Discussion

Here, we demonstrated that hypophosphatemia was significantly associated with renal function impairment in patients with CHB receiving antiviral therapy. Furthermore, our study showed that hypophosphatemia during antiviral therapy is not related to electrolyte disturbances, including hypokalemia or hypouricemia. The incidence of infection was also comparable between groups regardless of the hypophosphatemia status.
The development of hypophosphatemia during antiviral therapy in CHB patients has been reported in several studies. Shimizu et al. [12] reported six cases of hypophosphatemia among 17 patients with CHB treated with adefovir. Persistent hypophosphatemia developed in 14 of 292 patients receiving adefovir and lamivudine for CHB [13]. The incidence of hypophosphatemia was reportedly 25.4% (18 of 71) among patients who received tenofovir [14]. The incidence of hypophosphatemia in previous studies was significantly higher than that in our cohort. These discrepancies in the incidence of hypophosphatemia seem attributable to the small sample size, study population with comorbidities related to hypophosphatemia, short-term follow-up, or cross-sectional study design of previous studies. Our study thoroughly analyzed a larger number of CHB patients without potential confounding comorbidities affecting their serum phosphate levels or renal function and demonstrated a relatively low incidence of hypophosphatemia induced by antiviral therapy.
Although the actual incidence of hypophosphatemia was low in our study, its development was associated with a decline in renal function. Several previous studies reported hypophosphatemia and renal function decline with antiviral agent treatment among patients with CHB [12,13,15,16]. A decline in eGFR of more than 30% was reported in patients with hypophosphatemia among 292 CHB patients treated with adefovir and lamivudine [13]. In our study, serum phosphate level was a useful surrogate marker for predicting changes in renal function with correction for the effects of time and group using a linear mixed model. Essig et al. [17] suggested the use of serum phosphate levels as a sensitive marker for predicting kidney injury in patients with human immunodeficiency virus. As shown in our results, serum phosphate level may also be a surrogate marker for predicting renal outcomes in CHB patients treated with antiviral agents.
This study excluded patients with comorbid diseases, such as DM and hypertension, that could affect renal function or electrolytes. DM and hypertension are well-known risk factors for the development and progression of CKD [1821]. In CHB patients receiving antiviral agents, age, hypertension, DM, liver or kidney transplantation, underlying CKD, and diuretic use are reportedly risk factors for renal function decline [22]. In clinical practice, frequent or careful monitoring of renal function is usually performed in patients with these risk factors. Renal function monitoring can be neglected in patients with CHB without CKD risk factors. Our study findings suggest that a declining serum phosphate level, even in the absence of known risk factors, may be an early sign of renal dysfunction that requires more careful monitoring of renal function and renoprotective management.
Phosphate plays an important role in cell structure and signaling [9]. Hypophosphatemia is known to impair hematopoietic cell function and subsequently increase infection susceptibility, especially by suppressing the phagocytosis of white blood cells [10]. In our study, the incidence of significant infections requiring antibiotic treatment was comparable between groups regardless of hypophosphatemia status. These results suggest that hypophosphatemia, induced by antiviral agents in patients with CHB, may not be serious enough to significantly suppress immune cells.
Antiviral drug-related proximal tubular damage can cause Fanconi syndrome, which is characterized by hypokalemia, glycosuria, hypouricemia, and hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis [2]. In previous studies, adefovir and tenofovir reportedly induced proximal tubular defects [2326]. However, in our study, the prevalence of hypokalemia, hypouricemia, and metabolic acidosis was comparable among groups divided by serum phosphate level. These results suggest that the main mechanism of antiviral agent-induced hypophosphatemia in CHB patients without risk factors for CKD is the isolated dysfunction of a phosphate transporter rather than generalized proximal tubular dysfunction [8].
This study has some limitations. First, some baseline characteristics differed between the groups because of the retrospective cohort design. To overcome this limitation, we used a linear mixed model. As the data used in this study were unbalanced and repeatedly measured, the variables were modeled as fixed effects. We analyzed the effect of each variable on eGFR through this model and confirmed that the group depending on serum phosphate levels showed a significant difference in renal outcome over time. Second, this was a retrospective study, and only 2.1% (90 of 4,335) of all patients were tested for the urine spot protein-to-creatinine ratio. In this study, significant renal decline occurred over time when hypophosphatemia developed. Since this study confirmed only a decrease in eGFR, additional studies should be considered to determine whether proteinuria occurs significantly in the hypophosphatemia group. Third, detailed nutritional status such as vitamin D deficiency was not included in the analyses. Phosphate homeostasis is regulated by dietary intake, gastrointestinal absorption, bone resorption, and renal excretion [9]. Although we could not include dietary factors related to phosphate balance in the analysis, we believe that the overall nutritional status of our cohort would exert little or a negligible effect on the results because we excluded patients with comorbidities such as decompensated liver cirrhosis, DM, and hypertension. In addition, the number of patients with malnutrition, defined as a BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2 was relatively small in this study [27]. Also, we used the median value of multiple serum phosphate levels during the follow-up period in the analyses to minimize the confounding effects of variability in serum phosphate concentration influenced by diet. Fourth, the interaction between hypophosphatemia and the skeletal system was not estimated because of the limited data available for this single-center retrospective cohort study. Adult chronic hypophosphatemia can lead to impaired mineralization of the bone and subsequent osteomalacia [28,29]. Further prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required to elucidate the clinical relevance of hypophosphatemia in terms of metabolic bone disease in patients with CHB.
In conclusion, hypophosphatemia induced by antiviral agents is significantly associated with a decline in renal function. Although the incidence of hypophosphatemia during antiviral therapy is relatively low, our results support the clinical significance of serum phosphate monitoring and renoprotective management in patients with CHB and hypophosphatemia or declining serum phosphate levels.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

This study was supported by the Korean Health Technology R&D Project (grant number: HC20C0085) through the Korean Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ji Hyun Kang of Samsung Medical Center for her dedicated efforts as a clinical research coordinator. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.co.kr) for English language editing.

Data sharing statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology: MYP, HRJ

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation: All authors

Funding acquisition: HRJ

Writing–original draft: MYP, HRJ

Writing–review & editing: All authors

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Figure 1.

Flow chart for inclusion and exclusion.

CHB, chronic hepatitis B.
j-krcp-22-197f1.jpg
Figure 2.

Changes in renal function.

Serial changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; mean ± standard deviation) were calculated using the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equation according to the following: development of hypophosphatemia after antiviral agent initiation.
*p < 0.05 compared with the control group.
j-krcp-22-197f2.jpg
Figure 3.

Changes in renal function analyzed with the linear mixed model.

Serial changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were calculated by the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equation according to the following: development of hypophosphatemia after antiviral agent initiation.
*p < 0.05 compared with the control group. p-value was analyzed by type III test.
j-krcp-22-197f3.jpg
Figure 4.

Serial changes in serum potassium, uric acid, and total carbon dioxide levels according to hypophosphatemia status.

(A) Serum potassium (mean ± standard deviation). (B) Serum uric acid (mean ± standard deviation). (C) Serum total carbon dioxide (mean ± standard deviation).
*p < 0.05 compared with the control group.
j-krcp-22-197f4.jpg
j-krcp-22-197f5.jpg
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics according to the median phosphate levels serum phosphate quartiles during the follow-up period
Variable Control group Hypophosphatemia group p-value
No. of patients 4,260 (98.3) 75 (1.7) -
Antiviral agent 0.06
 Lamivudine 1,272 (29.9) 20 (26.7)
 Tenofovir 668 (15.7) 8 (10.7)
 Entecavir 1,897 (44.5) 33 (44.0)
 Adefovir 366 (8.6) 13 (17.3)
 Telbivudine or clevudine 57 (1.3) 1 (1.3)
Follow-up period (yr) 6 (4–11) 5 (3–11) 0.88
Age (yr) 51 (42–59) 53 (48–60) 0.04
Male sex 3,030 (71.1) 59 (78.7) 0.15
Body mass index (kg/m2) 23.6 (21.7–25.7) 24.4 (22–26) 0.06
Hepatocellular carcinoma 2,786 (65.4) 49 (65.3) 0.99
Child-pugh score 0.20
 A 3,380 (79.3) 55 (73.3)
 B 880 (20.7) 20 (26.7)
 C 0 (0) 0 (0)
Serum Cr (mg/dL) 0.85 (0.73–0.96) 0.91 (0.76–1.04) 0.002
eGFR by CKD-EPI (mL/min/1.73 m2) 97.3 (87.7–105.3) 92.8 (76.2–100.8) 0.003
eGFR by MDRD (mL/min/1.73 m2) 90.4 (80.5–101.2) 85.5 (69.4–95.1) 0.01

Data are expressed as number (%) or median (interquartile range).

CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; Cr, creatinine; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MDRD, Modified Diet in Renal Disease.

Table 2.
Results of the linear mixed model for the eGFR, estimated by CKD-EPI according to the median phosphate levels
Effect Estimate Standard error F-value p-valuea
Intercept 159.4 0.5980 <0.001
Groupb –2.9547 0.9221 11.51 <0.001
Time (mo) 22.36 <0.001
 6 –1.0988 0.1464
 12 –2.7942 0.1624
 18 –4.3486 0.1800
 24 –5.5443 0.1912
Baseline serum creatinine –34.1668 0.4033 7,177 <0.001
Age –0.672 0.0093 5,268 <0.001
Group-by-time 0.74 0.57

CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

aAnalyzed by type III tests.

bHypophosphatemia group and control group.

Table 3.
Subgroup analyses by linear mixed model according to the antiviral agents
Effect Estimate Standard error p-valuea
Lamivudine
 Intercept 166.23 1.0942
 Group –1.8516 1.6553 0.16
 Time (mo) <0.001
  6 –0.2952 0.2715
  12 –2.0106 0.2917
  18 –4.3711 0.3174
  24 –5.4023 0.362
 Baseline serum creatinine –40.4906 0.8449 <0.001
 Age –0.7087 0.01589 <0.001
 Group-by-time 0.87
Entecavir
 Intercept 162.52 0.8564
 Group –1.7974 1.2706 0.09
 Time (mo) <0.001
  6 –1.3705 0.2174
  12 –2.673 0.2403
  18 –3.784 0.2802
  24 –4.9596 0.2884
 Baseline serum creatinine –37.8968 0.5932 <0.001
 Age –0.6616 0.01269 <0.001
 Group-by-time 0.19
Adefovir
 Intercept 153.74 2.2855
 Group –6.3688 2.9045 0.05
 Time (mo) 0.002
  6 –0.6313 0.4973
  12 –2.1516 0.5623
  18 –4.3307 0.5819
  24 –5.7863 0.5686
 Baseline serum creatinine –24.1945 1.1113 <0.001
 Age –0.7548 0.04279 <0.001
 Group-by-time 0.87
Tenofovir
 Intercept 155.03 1.4731
 Group –5.2195 2.8443 0.04
 Time (mo) <0.001
  6 –1.8218 0.3659
  12 –4.6649 0.3939
  18 –5.9291 0.4325
  24 –7.1512 0.461
 Baseline serum creatinine –30.9679 0.9321 <0.001
 Age –0.6459 0.02376 <0.001
 Group-by-time 0.14
Telbivudine or clevudine
 Intercept 177.59 4.8416
 Group –3.3425 6.0964 0.59
 Time (mo) 0.01
  6 –2.5017 0.9369
  12 –3.3819 1.9699
  18 –3.5889 1.5241
  24 –6.5475 1.9007
 Baseline serum creatinine –53.675 4.5822 <0.001
 Age –0.7064 0.05184 <0.001

Group, hypophosphatemia group and control group.

aAnalyzed by type III tests.

References

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Hepatitis B [Internet]. WHO, 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b
2. Izzedine H, Launay-Vacher V, Deray G. Antiviral drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Am J Kidney Dis 2005;45:804–817.
crossref pmid
3. Lee HY, Oh H, Park CH, Yeo YH, Nguyen MH, Jun DW. Comparison of renal safety of tenofovir and entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B: systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2019;25:2961–2972.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Tourret J, Deray G, Isnard-Bagnis C. Tenofovir effect on the kidneys of HIV-infected patients: a double-edged sword? J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;24:1519–1527.
pmid pmc
5. Ha NB, Ha NB, Garcia RT, et al. Renal dysfunction in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with adefovir dipivoxil. Hepatology 2009;50:727–734.
crossref pmid
6. Wang BF, Wang Y, Wang BY, Sun FR, Zhang D, Chen YS. Osteomalacia and Fanconi’s syndrome caused by long-term low-dose adefovir dipivoxil. J Clin Pharm Ther 2015;40:345–348.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Conti F, Vitale G, Cursaro C, Bernardi M, Andreone P. Tenofovir-induced Fanconi syndrome in a patient with chronic hepatitis B monoinfection. Ann Hepatol 2016;15:273–276.
pmid
8. Blaine J, Chonchol M, Levi M. Renal control of calcium, phosphate, and magnesium homeostasis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;10:1257–1272.
crossref pmid
9. Florenzano P, Cipriani C, Roszko KL, et al. Approach to patients with hypophosphataemia. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020;8:163–174.
crossref pmid
10. Craddock PR, Yawata Y, VanSanten L, Gilberstadt S, Silvis S, Jacob HS. Acquired phagocyte dysfunction: a complication of the hypophosphatemia of parenteral hyperalimentation. N Engl J Med 1974;290:1403–1407.
crossref pmid
11. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2018;69:406–460.
crossref pmid
12. Shimizu Y, Hiraoka A, Yamago H, et al. Hypophosphatemia in patients with hepatitis B virus infection undergoing long-term adefovir dipivoxil therapy. Hepatol Res 2014;44:1081–1087.
pmid
13. Tanaka M, Suzuki F, Seko Y, et al. Renal dysfunction and hypophosphatemia during long-term lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Gastroenterol 2014;49:470–480.
crossref pmid pdf
14. Lee D, Yun BC, Seo KI, et al. Risk factors associated with hypophosphatemia in chronic Hepatitis B patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e18351.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Izzedine H, Hulot JS, Launay-Vacher V, et al. Renal safety of adefovir dipivoxil in patients with chronic hepatitis B: two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Kidney Int 2004;66:1153–1158.
crossref pmid
16. Lai MC, Lian JS, Zhang WJ, Xu J, Zhou L, Zheng SS. Compare with safety and efficacy of entecavir and adefovir dipivoxil combination therapy and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B patient with adefovir-resistant. Math Biosci Eng 2019;17:627–635.
crossref pmid
17. Essig M, Duval X, Kaied FA, et al. Is phosphatemia the best tool to monitor renal tenofovir toxicity? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2007;46:256–258.
crossref pmid
18. Leehey DJ, Kramer HJ, Daoud TM, Chatha MP, Isreb MA. Progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes: beyond blood pressure control: an observational study. BMC Nephrol 2005;6:8.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
19. Parving HH, Lehnert H, Bröchner-Mortensen J, et al. The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001;345:870–878.
crossref pmid
20. Viberti G, Wheeldon NM; MicroAlbuminuria Reduction With VALsartan (MARVAL) Study Investigators. Microalbuminuria reduction with valsartan in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a blood pressure-independent effect. Circulation 2002;106:672–678.
crossref pmid
21. Johnson RJ, Segal MS, Srinivas T, et al. Essential hypertension, progressive renal disease, and uric acid: a pathogenetic link? J Am Soc Nephrol 2005;16:1909–1919.
pmid
22. Shin JH, Kwon HJ, Jang HR, et al. Risk factors for renal functional decline in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving oral antiviral agents. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e2400.
crossref pmid pmc
23. Casado JL. Renal and bone toxicity with the use of tenofovir: understanding at the end. AIDS Rev 2016;18:59–68.
pmid
24. Fisher EJ, Chaloner K, Cohn DL, et al. The safety and efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil in patients with advanced HIV disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. AIDS 2001;15:1695–1700.
crossref pmid
25. Izzedine H, Isnard-Bagnis C, Hulot JS, et al. Renal safety of tenofovir in HIV treatment-experienced patients. AIDS 2004;18:1074–1076.
crossref pmid
26. Xiang Q, Liu Z, Yu Y, et al. Osteomalacia and renal failure due to Fanconi syndrome caused by long-term low-dose Adefovir Dipivoxil: a case report. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2020;21:43.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
27. Cederholm T, Bosaeus I, Barazzoni R, et al. Diagnostic criteria for malnutrition: an ESPEN Consensus Statement. Clin Nutr 2015;34:335–340.
crossref pmid
28. Fung J, Seto WK, Lai CL, Yuen MF. Extrahepatic effects of nucleoside and nucleotide analogues in chronic hepatitis B treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;29:428–434.
pmid
29. Kim du H, Sung DH, Min YK. Hypophosphatemic osteomalacia induced by low-dose adefovir therapy: focus on manifestations in the skeletal system and literature review. J Bone Miner Metab 2013;31:240–246.
crossref pmid pdf


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#301, (Miseung Bldg.) 23, Apgujenog-ro 30-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06022, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3486-8736    Fax: +82-2-3486-8737    E-mail: registry@ksn.or.kr                

Copyright © 2025 by The Korean Society of Nephrology.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer