Kidney Res Clin Pract > Epub ahead of print
Noh, Min, Lee, Kim, Kang, and Kim: Frailty-related factors and 1-year renal function change after sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in elderly chronic kidney disease patients

Abstract

Background

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are first-line therapy for chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, evidence regarding their safety and efficacy in frail elderly patients remains limited. This study evaluated the impact of frailty-related factors on renal outcomes in elderly CKD patients treated with SGLT2i.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 302 elderly CKD patients (≥65 years) newly prescribed SGLT2i. Four frailty-related factors included advanced age (≥75 years), anemia, low Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI ≤98), and proteinuria. Rapid renal decline was defined as an absolute decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >10 mL/min/1.73 m² within 12 months or a ≥40% reduction from baseline.

Results

The mean age was 75.7 ± 8.1 years, and baseline eGFR was 48.1 mL/min/1.73 m². Anemia was present in 49.3% and low GNRI in 12.3% of patients. Those with low GNRI were older, had lower BMI and serum albumin levels, higher prevalence of anemia and proteinuria, and greater 12-month decline in eGFR (–4.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. –2.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, p < 0.01). Rapid renal decline occurred in 29 patients (9.6%), and risk increased with accumulation of frailty factors. Advanced age (≥75 years) alone was associated with higher risk (odds ratio [OR], 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–5.32), which further increased when combined with anemia and proteinuria (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 2.19–10.77). Patients with all four components had the highest risk (OR, 9.70; 95% CI, 3.82–24.81).

Conclusion

While SGLT2i are generally effective in elderly CKD patients, those with frailty-related factors, particularly malnutrition, proteinuria, and anemia, appear to be at higher risk of rapid decline in renal function. These patients may benefit from more individualized risk assessment and management.

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in the elderly population and is frequently accompanied by multiple comorbidities, frailty, and progressive decline in renal function [1,2]. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have emerged as a cornerstone in the management of CKD due to their robust nephroprotective and cardiovascular (CV) benefits. These agents are generally well-tolerated and remain effective even in older adults [35]. Beyond their glucose-lowering effects, SGLT2i significantly reduce proteinuria and attenuate the progression of renal impairment, both of which are critical for lowering CV risk in this vulnerable population [6,7].
The benefits of SGLT2i in the elderly population are especially critical as older patients typically are more susceptible to the adverse effects of CKD and may experience more pronounced benefits from interventions that can halt the progression of both renal and CV deterioration. However, prescription of SGLT2i in elderly patients necessitates careful consideration, particularly for those with frailty such as low body mass index (BMI), low blood pressure, compromised oral intake, or a heightened risk of volume depletion [811]. Notably, the initiation of SGLT2i therapy is associated with an initial dip in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), a phenomenon primarily reflecting hemodynamic effect in the kidney rather than actual renal damage [12]. This early eGFR decline, while generally transient in most cases, might cause consistent renal deterioration in those vulnerable elderly populations [13].
Our previous research highlighted that elderly patients might experience a more pronounced initial decline in eGFR following SGLT2i initiation. However, renal function generally stabilizes over the subsequent year, suggesting no overall long-term deterioration [14].
Nevertheless, that study did not evaluate which subgroups of patients are more vulnerable to rapid decline in renal function. To address this gap, the present study aimed to investigate the impact of frailty-associated factors on rapid renal function decline in elderly CKD patients treated with SGLT2i.

Methods

This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital with the waiver for informed consent (No. 2024-01-007). It was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki. Medical records were anonymized and de-identified before analysis.

Study design and subjects

This study utilized the clinical data warehouse, which has been operational since 2016 and employs the QlikView Elite Solution (QlikTech Inc.) for advanced big data analytics. As our center reports eGFR higher than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 as just >90 mL/min/1.73 m2, patients with an eGFR less than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 were included in this study. It was calculated with the creatinine-based CKD-EPI (CKD Epidemiology Collaboration) equation. Eligibility for the study required patients to have at least three recorded eGFR measurements: at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year. Initially, data were collected from 465 CKD patients aged 65 years or older who received SGLT2i therapy between June 2018 and December 2022. Among these, patients with incomplete data on critical variables such as height, body weight, serum albumin, or proteinuria (n = 163) were excluded. The final cohort for analysis included 302 elderly patients. To assess the risk of selection bias, we compared baseline characteristics between included and excluded patients. As shown in Supplementary Table 1 (available online), no significant differences were observed in age, sex, diabetes mellitus (DM) status, baseline eGFR, or medication use, suggesting that the final analytic sample was representative of the original cohort.

Covariates

Demographics data and baseline comorbidities were collected at the initiation of SGLT2i. A comprehensive panel of serum biochemical parameters, including hemoglobin, glucose, hemoglobin A1c, albumin, uric acid, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride levels, was assessed within 1 month prior to or on the date of SGLT2i initiation. Proteinuria was assessed using urine dipstick results, with proteinuria defined as ≥1+. In a subset of patients (n = 168), urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (uPCR, g/g) data were also available. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin <13.0 g/dL in male and <12.0 g/dL in female, consistent with World Health Organization criteria. Given the potential impact on renal hemodynamics, we also evaluated the effects of antihypertensive medications (renin-angiotensin system [RAS] blockers, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers [CCBs], and diuretics) and antidiabetic medications (metformin, sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 [DPP-4] inhibitors, and insulin).
All patients’ nutrition condition was evaluated according to Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) formula: GNRI = [1.489 × albumin (g/L)] + [41.7 × (weight/WLo)], where WLo means ideal weight and was calculated from the Lorentz equations: for male: H – 100 – [(H – 150)/4]; for female: H – 100 – [(H – 150)/2.5] (H, height) [15,16]. Even for patients with a height of less than 150 cm, the formula was used without modification. Based on previous literature, a GNRI value of ≤98 has been shown to identify patients with at least nutritional risk, while scores >98 indicate no risk [15,17]. Since this study analyzed patients in a chronic stable condition, we used a threshold of 98 for comparison.
In this study, we selected four objective and clinically relevant variables, more advanced age ≥75 years, anemia, proteinuria, and low GNRI (≤98), as frailty-related clinical factors, based on prior literature showing their associations with vulnerability and adverse outcomes in elderly CKD patients [1821].

Changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate and primary outcome

We calculated both the absolute and relative changes in eGFR at 3 and 12 months compared to baseline. In accordance with previous randomized controlled trials, a significant initial dip was defined as a >10% decline in eGFR at 3 months following SGLT2i initiation.
The primary renal outcome was defined as a composite of 1) an absolute decline in eGFR >10 mL/min/1.73 m2 within 12 months or 2) a ≥40% reduction from baseline. While a ≥40% decline is a well-validated surrogate endpoint for CKD progression [2224], we also included the absolute decline criterion to better capture early and clinically meaningful renal deterioration during the 12-month follow-up period. This approach was supported by previous data and reflects the clinical importance of sustained eGFR loss with SGLT2i initiation [25]. We have included a scatter plot (Supplementary Fig. 1, available online) that visually shows the concordance between these two renal outcome definitions

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses in this study were conducted using IBM SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp.). Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range, depending on the data distribution. Categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages. The differences in eGFR changes between the two GNRI groups were assessed using the independent samples t test for normally distributed data, while the Mann-Whitney U test was applied for non-normally distributed variables. These tests were utilized to compare the absolute and percentage changes in eGFR at 3 months and 12 months between the GNRI >98 and ≤98 groups. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression models to assess the impact of multiple frailty-associated factors on the rapid decline in renal function. The results were expressed as ORs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline clinical characteristics

This study included 302 elderly patients aged ≥65 years, comprising 191 males and 111 females. Among them, 246 (81.5%) had DM. The mean baseline eGFR was 48.1 ± 10.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, with 47.4% and 38.4% classified as having stage 3 and stage 4 CKD, respectively. Nutritional status appeared generally favorable, with a mean serum albumin level of 4.3 ± 0.4 g/dL and a mean GNRI of 112.5 ± 10.0. Based on a GNRI cutoff of 98, 37 patients (12.3%) were classified as having low GNRI. Table 1 compares the baseline characteristics between patients with low and high GNRI. Those in the low GNRI group were significantly older and had lower body weight and BMI (all p < 0.001). They also exhibited lower levels of hemoglobin, total protein, albumin, phosphate, and triglycerides. Importantly, proteinuria was more prevalent and severe in this group, with a mean uPCR of 1.8 ± 2.4 g/g, compared to 0.7 ± 1.1 g/g in the high GNRI group (p = 0.01). No significant differences were found in lipid profiles, including total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C.
Regarding medication use, 233 patients (77.1%) were receiving RAS blockers, 157 (52.0%) were on CCBs, and 88 (29.1%) were using diuretics, with no significant differences between GNRI groups. However, patients with GNRI ≤98 were more likely to be prescribed loop diuretics compared to those with GNRI >98 (32.4% vs. 17.0%, p = 0.07), suggesting a potential trend toward higher diuretic burden in the nutritionally vulnerable group. Metformin was more frequently prescribed in the high GNRI group, while the use of other antidiabetic medications, including sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, and insulin, was comparable between the groups.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate changes at 3 and 12 months by Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index group

Table 2 presents the differences in eGFR across baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, stratified by GNRI groups. This study only included patients who had mandatory eGFR data at baseline, as well as at 3 and 12 months; eGFR at the 6-month interval was available for only 180 participants. At baseline, eGFR values were comparable between the low and high GNRI groups. From 3 months onwards, however, those with a GNRI score ≤98 experienced a greater decrease in eGFR.
We evaluated both absolute and percentage changes in eGFR at 3 and 12 months after SGLT2i initiation. Higher GNRI scores were associated with more stable renal function (Fig. 1A, B), while patients with GNRI ≤98 showed significantly greater declines at both time points (Fig. 1CF). For 12 months, those with GNRI >98 had a modest decline (–2.0 mL/min/1.73 m2), consistent with previous studies. In contrast, those with GNRI ≤98 experienced a more substantial reduction (–4.0 mL/min/1.73 m2). This suggests that SGLT2i are generally well-tolerated by most elderly patients with CKD; however, those with a low GNRI score may be more vulnerable to renal function decline. Additionally, an initial eGFR dip >10% at 3 months was more common in the low GNRI group (51.4% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01) (Table 2).

Frailty-related factors and rapid decline in renal function

Rapid decline in renal function occurred in 29 patients (9.6%). Compared to those without decline, these patients were older (81.6 years vs. 78.3 years, p = 0.045), with lower hemoglobin, serum albumin, and GNRI scores (all p < 0.001), and a higher prevalence of proteinuria (p = 0.001). Based on these findings, we evaluated the impact of four frailty-related factors: advanced age (≥75 years), anemia, low GNRI (≤98), and proteinuria.
In univariate logistic regression (Table 3), each factor was significantly associated with rapid eGFR decline: age ≥75 years (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.03–5.32), anemia (OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.50–8.75), proteinuria (OR, 4.80; 95% CI, 1.78–10.15), and low GNRI (OR, 8.43; 95% CI, 3.62–16.66). Diuretic use was also associated (OR, 4.08; 95% CI, 1.86–8.98). However, in the multivariable model, proteinuria (OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.34–11.02; p = 0.01), low GNRI (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.03–7.35; p = 0.04), and diuretic use (OR, 3.75; 95% CI, 1.60–8.80; p = 0.002) remained significant predictors. Anemia showed a borderline association (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 0.91–6.95; p = 0.07), whereas age ≥75 years was no longer significant (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.51–3.59; p = 0.60), suggesting that frailty-related comorbidities rather than age per se were more predictive of renal decline.
Given the strong predictive value of low GNRI in the multivariable model, we further assessed the comparative performance of nutritional markers. Additional models incorporating GNRI, serum albumin, or BMI were evaluated to determine which parameter better captured nutritional risk. Both GNRI and serum albumin were significantly associated with rapid decline in renal function, whereas BMI was not. The area under the curve was similar for GNRI (0.833) and albumin (0.832), and lower for BMI (0.789) (Supplementary Table 2, available online).
A cumulative risk assessment (Fig. 2) demonstrated a clear stepwise increase in the odds of rapid decline in renal function with the accumulation of frailty-related factors. Age ≥75 years alone was associated with increased risk (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.03–5.32), which rose with the addition of anemia (OR, 3.86; 95% CI, 1.76–8.47) and further with proteinuria (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 2.19–10.77). Notably, patients exhibiting had the highest risk (OR, 9.70; 95% CI, 3.82–24.81). These findings highlight a graded association between the number of frailty-related clinical factors and the likelihood of rapid renal decline.

Discussion

This study demonstrated that SGLT2i are generally effective and well-tolerated in elderly patients with CKD, with a mean annual eGFR decline of –2.0 mL/min/1.73 m2, consistent with the –2.16 mL/min/1.73 m2 reported in the EMPA-KIDNEY trial [26]. However, patients with frailty-related factors, defined by more advanced age, anemia, proteinuria, and low GNRI, exhibited a substantially greater decline, with a median annual eGFR loss of –4.0 mL/min/1.73 m2. These findings suggest that, despite the overall renoprotective effects of SGLT2i, frailty-associated factors may confer additional vulnerability to rapid renal function loss. While prior studies have demonstrated the safety of SGLT2i even in frail individuals [27], our results underscore the importance of optimizing modifiable risk factors such as anemia, use of diuretics, and nutritional status before and during SGLT2i therapy to minimize adverse outcomes.
The KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) 2024 guidelines recommend SGLT2i as first-line therapy for CKD, regardless of DM status [28]. Major trials such as VERTIS-CV and DECLARE-TIMI 58 have confirmed their efficacy in patients aged ≥65 years, with no significant increase in adverse events [35]. However, a recent systematic review in frail or older adults with DM and heart failure (HF) reported no significant renal or macrovascular benefit, despite reductions in all-cause mortality and CV risk [29]. These discrepancies underscore the need for real-world data focused on renal outcomes in elderly patients with frailty-related factors.
In this elderly CKD population (mean age, 75 years), nutritional status emerged as a key determinant of eGFR changes following SGLT2i initiation. This finding aligns with prior studies showing that malnutrition is common in older adults with CKD and is strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes [30,31]. The hemodynamic effects of SGLT2i, particularly the reduction of intraglomerular pressure, may be compromised in the presence of hypoalbuminemia, a key contributor to low GNRI scores [32]. This aligns with previous studies showing that malnutrition and hypoalbuminemia, both common in older adults, can lead to volume depletion and impaired renal hemodynamics, thereby accelerating eGFR decline [33,34]. More importantly, low GNRI remained independently associated with rapid decline in renal function even after adjusting for proteinuria, suggesting that GNRI captures additional prognostic dimensions such as sarcopenia and physiologic vulnerability, not reflected by albuminuria alone.
Although our findings may appear to contrast with a DAPA-CKD subgroup analysis that found no excess renal risk among severely frail patients [27], key methodological differences exist. The frailty index in DAPA-CKD did not incorporate nutritional markers such as GNRI, and their study evaluated long-term outcomes in a controlled trial setting.
And although patients aged ≥75 years exhibited greater eGFR decline in univariate analysis, age did not remain an independent predictor in multivariable models. This attenuation may reflect confounding by nutritional and hemodynamic factors, including diuretic use. These findings are consistent with prior data demonstrating that chronological age alone does not modify the renal benefits of SGLT2i, and reinforce the notion that clinical frailty, rather than age per se, may better capture the heterogeneity of treatment response in older adults [35,36].
We also found that diuretic use emerged as another independent predictor of rapid decline in renal function. This likely reflects both the hemodynamic effects of combined natriuresis as well as the underlying clinical indication for the use of diuretics (e.g., fluid overload, HF), which is itself a marker of poor prognosis. Caution should be exercised when prescribing concurrent diuretics and SGLT2i in elderly CKD patients, with close attention to volume status and comorbidity burden.
Another notable observation in this study is the possible role of anemia in predicting renal function decline in elderly patients treated with SGLT2i. While SGLT2i are known to enhance erythropoiesis via modulation of hypoxia-inducible pathways [37,38], the presence of baseline anemia may still portend adverse renal outcomes. Mechanisms may include impaired erythropoietin production, inflammation-driven hepcidin elevation, and renal hypoxia [3941]. While prior studies have focused on hemoglobin improvements during therapy, few have explored the prognostic implications of pre-existing anemia in this context. Further studies are needed to delineate the prognostic role of anemia in this setting and its implications for individualized treatment strategies.
It is important to note that all patients in our study were treated with SGLT2i; thus, we could not assess whether baseline factors such as anemia or proteinuria modified the therapeutic effect of SGLT2i. Rather, our findings suggest that these clinical parameters serve as prognostic indicators, helping to identify patients who remain at increased risk of renal deterioration despite therapy.
Despite these strengths, this study has several limitations. First, it was a single-center retrospective analysis, which may limit external generalizability. However, the inclusion of over 300 elderly patients offers valuable real-world insights. Second, the proportion of patients with low GNRI was relatively small (12.3%), potentially limiting the broader applicability of nutritional risk findings. Third, while malnutrition and hypoalbuminemia were hypothesized to contribute to renal decline, we were unable to assess inflammation-related markers such as C-reactive protein or interleukin-6, which may underlie the interplay between frailty, malnutrition, anemia, and renal progression. We also acknowledge the clinical relevance of volume status, particularly in patients receiving SGLT2i, due to the drug’s natriuretic and hemodynamic effects. However, due to the retrospective design and lack of standardized assessments, we could not adequately account for this variable. Lastly, a validated frailty index could not be applied, as functional and cognitive measures were not consistently available in the electronic medical records. Instead, we used objective clinical surrogates including age, anemia, GNRI, and proteinuria to reflect frailty-related risk. While these proxies are supported by prior literature, they do not fully capture the multidimensional construct of frailty.
In summary, SGLT2i appears to be generally safe and effective in elderly CKD patients, particularly among those with preserved nutritional status. While older age is often considered a risk factor for adverse outcomes, our findings suggest that age alone is not the primary driver of early renal function loss. Rather, the presence of frailty-related factors such as anemia, proteinuria, and low GNRI more accurately identifies those at heightened risk despite SGLT2i therapy. These results underscore the importance of comprehensive baseline assessment beyond chronological age.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data are available at Kidney Research and Clinical Practice online (https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.25.110).

Notes

Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

This research was supported by Hallym University Research Fund 2024 (HURF-2024-29).

Data sharing statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition: JKK

Investigation: HMN, HSL, SGK

Methodology: HSL, SGK

Project administration, Resources: JGK

Writing–original draft: HMN, SHM, JKK

Writing–review & editing: All authors

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Figure 1.

Association between GNRI and eGFR changes after SGLT2i initiation.

Relationship between GNRI score and the absolute (A) and percentage (B) change in eGFR at 12 months after SGLT2i initiation, showing a trend toward greater eGFR decline in patients with lower GNRI. Comparison of absolute (C) and percentage (D) changes in eGFR at 3 months between patients with GNRI ≤98 and >98. Comparison of absolute (E) and percentage (F) changes in eGFR at 12 months between the two GNRI groups.
eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GNRI, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors.
j-krcp-25-110f1.jpg
Figure 2.

Incremental increase in risk of rapid decline in eGFR based on cumulative frailty-related factors.

Odds ratios (ORs) for rapid decline in renal function are shown according to the number and combination of frailty-associated risk factors: age ≥75 years, anemia (hemoglobin <13.0 g/dL in male and <12.0 g/dL in female), proteinuria (≥1+ on dipstick), and GNRI ≤98. The risk increased stepwise with each additional factor, with the highest OR observed in patients with all four factors. Bars indicate ORs with 95% confidence intervals; numbers above each bar represent the corresponding OR and patient count (n).
eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GNRI, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors.
j-krcp-25-110f2.jpg
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of study subjects
Characteristic Total GNRI
>98 ≤98 p-value
No. of subjects 302 (100) 265 (87.7) 37 (12.3)
Age (yr) 75.7 ± 8.1 75.0 ± 8.3 80.8 ± 8.4 <0.001
 ≥75 yr 153 (50.7) 124 (46.8) 29 (78.4) <0.001
Male sex 191 (63.2) 168 (63.4) 23 (62.2) 0.46
Diabetes mellitus 246 (81.5) 218 (82.3) 28 (75.7) 0.23
SBP (mmHg) 128.3 ± 20.2 127.7 ± 19.3 132.7 ± 24.6 0.28
DBP (mmHg) 71.6 ± 13.3 71.5 ± 13.8 72.5 ± 10.6 0.67
Height (cm) 161.2 ± 10.3 161.4 ± 10.5 160.2 ± 9.3 0.47
Body weight (kg) 67.2 ± 12.0 69.0 ± 11.7 56.4 ± 7.7 <0.001
BMI (kg/m2) 25.6 ± 3.6 26.2 ± 3.4 22.2 ± 2.2 <0.001
Coronary artery disease 83 (27.5) 69 (26.0) 14 (37.8) 0.41
Heart failure 60 (19.9) 49 (18.5) 11 (29.7) 0.31
Cerebrovascular disease 31 (10.3) 26 (9.8) 5 (13.5) 0.55
Peripheral artery disease 6 (2.0) 3 (1.1) 3 (8.1) 0.06
Medication
 RAS inhibitor 233 (77.1) 197 (74.3) 36 (97.3) 0.40
 Calcium channel blockers 157 (52.0) 132 (49.8) 25 (67.6) 0.049
 Beta-blockers 129 (42.7) 112 (42.3) 17 (45.9) 0.45
 Diuretics 88 (29.1) 73 (27.5) 15 (40.5) 0.33
  Loop diuretics 57 (18.8) 45 (17.0) 12 (32.4) 0.07
  Thiazide diuretics 25 (8.3) 22 (8.3) 3 (8.1) 0.51
  Spironolactone 18 (5.9) 15 (5.7) 3 (8.1) 0.24
 Metformin 178 (58.9) 168 (63.4) 10 (27.0) <0.001
 Sulfonylurea 113 (37.4) 98 (37.0) 15 (40.5) 0.25
 DPP-4 inhibitor 75 (24.8) 65 (24.5) 10 (27.0) 0.40
 Insulin 53 (17.5) 43 (16.2) 10 (27.0) 0.29
Laboratory parameter
 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.7 ± 1.9 12.9 ± 1.9 11.2 ± 1.6 <0.001
 Hemoglobin A1c (%) 7.6 ± 1.5 7.6 ± 1.4 7.3 ± 1.4 0.34
 BUN (mg/dL) 24.3 ± 8.5 24.4 ± 9.7 24.3 ± 8.3 0.97
 Creatinine (mg/dL) 1.5 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.3 1.4 ± 0.3 0.53
 eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 48.1 ± 10.1 47.9 ± 10.2 48.0 ± 9.4 0.73
  CKD stage 2 43 (14.2) 36 (13.6) 7 (18.9) 0.31
  CKD stage 3 143 (47.4) 125 (47.2) 18 (48.6)
  CKD stage 4 116 (38.4) 104 (39.2) 12 (32.4)
 Protein (g/dL) 7.0 ± 0.6 7.2 ± 0.6 6.4 ± 0.7 <0.001
 Albumin (g/dL) 4.3 ± 0.4 4.4 ± 0.3 3.5 ± 0.4 <0.001
 Calcium (mg/dL) 10.1 ± 0.6 10.3 ± 0.6 8.8 ± 0.5 0.37
 Phosphate (mg/dL) 3.7 ± 0.6 3.9 ± 0.5 3.5 ± 0.6 0.03
 Uric acid (mg/dL) 5.8 ± 1.6 5.9 ± 1.5 5.6 ± 1.6 0.16
 Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 140 ± 36.7 139.6 ± 34.8 143.2 ± 49.4 0.59
 Triglyceride (mg/dL) 149.2 ± 69.4 153.3 ± 69.7 125.1 ± 64.0 0.02
 HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 44.0 ± 13.8 44.4 ± 13.0 45.1 ± 18.3 0.39
 LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 75.9 ± 26.1 75.8 ± 25.4 76.4 ± 30.5 0.86
 Proteinuria <0.001
  None 145 (48.0) 140 (52.8) 5 (13.5)
  1+ 81 (26.8) 69 (26.0) 12 (32.4)
  2+ 45 (14.9) 36 (13.6) 9 (24.3)
  3+ 31 (10.3) 19 (7.2) 12 (32.4)
 Protein/creatinine ratio (g/g)a 1.1 ± 1.8 0.7 ± 1.1 1.8 ± 2.4 0.01

Data are expressed as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

BMI, body mass index; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CKD, chronic kidney disease; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GNRI, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; RAS, renin-angiotensin system; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

aAvailable in 168 patients.

Table 2.
1-Year changes in eGFR by GNRI in elderly patients
Variable Total (n = 302) GNRI
>98 (n = 265, 87.7%) ≤98 (n = 37, 12.3%) p-value
Mean eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
 Baseline 48.1 ± 10.1 47.9 ± 10.2 48.0 ± 9.4 0.52
 3 mo 45.6 ± 12.4 46.0 ± 12.4 43.0 ± 13.0 0.11
 6 mo 46.3 ± 12.7 46.4 ± 12.7 45.6 ± 13.3 0.76
 12 mo 45.7 ± 11.6 46.0 ± 11.4 42.7 ± 13.1 0.095
Changes in mean eGFR
 12-mo absolute difference –2.0 (–6.0 to 2.0) –2.0 (–5.0 to 2.0) – 4.0 (–10 to 0) <0.001
 12-mo decline (%) –4.5 (–12.5 to 3.5) –3.6 (–12.0 to 4.6) –8.8 (–20 to 0) <0.001
 3-mo absolute difference –1.0 (–3.0 to 2.0) –1.5 (–5.0 to 2.0) –4.7 (–10.5 to 1.0) 0.002
 3-mo decline (%) –3.0 (–12.7 to 5.4) –2.5 (–11.7 to 5.7) –10.5 (–20.0 to 5.0) 0.04
 eGFR dip >10% 102 (33.8) 83 (31.3) 19 (51.4) 0.01

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or number (%).

eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GNRI, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index.

Table 3.
Factors affecting rapid decline in renal function based on 12-month eGFR change
Variable Unadjusted Adjusteda
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value
Age, ≥75 yr 2.34 (1.03–5.32) 0.04 1.29 (0.48–3.48) 0.61
Male sex 1.24 (0.57–2.70) 0.59 1.28 (0.52–3.19) 0.58
Diabetes mellitus, presence 2.01 (0.61–7.16) 0.24 2.72 (0.72–10.27) 0.14
Diuretic use, user vs. non-user 4.08 (1.86–8.98) <0.001 3.75 (1.60–8.80) 0.002
Anemiab 3.61 (1.50–8.75) 0.004 2.51 (0.91–6.95) 0.07
Baseline eGFR, <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 1.98 (0.45–8.72) 0.36 1.54 (0.32–7.39) 0.59
Proteinuria, presence 4.80 (1.78–10.15) 0.002 3.84 (1.34–11.02) 0.01
GNRI, ≤98 8.43 (3.62–16.66) <0.001 2.75 (1.03–7.35) 0.04

CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GNRI, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index; HR, hazard ratio.

aAdjusted for age ≥75 years, sex, diabetes, diuretic use, anemia, baseline eGFR, presence of proteinuria, and GNRI.

bMale, <13 g/dL; female, <12 g/dL.

References

1. Mallappallil M, Friedman EA, Delano BG, McFarlane SI, Salifu MO. Chronic kidney disease in the elderly: evaluation and management. Clin Pract (Lond) 2014;11:525–535.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Chao CT, Kovesdy CP, Merchant RA. Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, and frailty in individuals with chronic kidney disease: a comprehensive review. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2025 Jan 21 [Epub]. DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.24.207.
crossref
3. Pratley RE, Cannon CP, Cherney DZ, et al. Cardiorenal outcomes, kidney function, and other safety outcomes with ertugliflozin in older adults with type 2 diabetes (VERTIS CV): secondary analyses from a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet Healthy Longev 2023;4:e143–e154.
crossref pmid
4. Kambara T, Shibata R, Osanai H, et al. Use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018;18:108–114.
crossref pmid pdf
5. Yabe D, Shiki K, Homma G, et al. Efficacy and safety of the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor empagliflozin in elderly Japanese adults (≥65 years) with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 52-week clinical trial (EMPA-ELDERLY). Diabetes Obes Metab 2023;25:3538–3548.
crossref pmid
6. Oh TJ, Moon JY, Hur KY, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor for renal function preservation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Korean Diabetes Association and Korean Society of Nephrology consensus statement. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2020;39:269–283.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Toyama T, Neuen BL, Jun M, et al. Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular, renal and safety outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019;21:1237–1250.
crossref pmid pdf
8. Maresova P, Javanmardi E, Barakovic S, et al. Consequences of chronic diseases and other limitations associated with old age: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 2019;19:1431.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
9. Volkert D, Beck AM, Cederholm T, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clin Nutr 2019;38:10–47.
crossref pmid
10. Scheen AJ, Bonnet F. Efficacy and safety profile of SGLT2 inhibitors in the elderly: how is the benefit/risk balance? Diabetes Metab 2023;49:101419.
crossref pmid
11. Santulli G, Varzideh F, Forzano I, et al. Functional and clinical importance of SGLT2-inhibitors in frailty: from the kidney to the heart. Hypertension 2023;80:1800–1809.
crossref pmid
12. Jongs N, Chertow GM, Greene T, et al. Correlates and consequences of an acute change in eGFR in response to the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in patients with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2022;33:2094–2107.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Bellary S, Barnett AH. SGLT2 inhibitors in older adults: overcoming the age barrier. Lancet Healthy Longev 2023;4:e127–e128.
crossref pmid
14. An HJ, Jang JH, Lee S, et al. Impact of age on eGFR dynamics following sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor therapy: a real-world study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2024;214:111796.
crossref pmid
15. Bouillanne O, Morineau G, Dupont C, et al. Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:777–783.
crossref pmid
16. Cereda E, Pedrolli C. The geriatric nutritional risk index. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2009;12:1–7.
crossref pmid
17. Kunimura A, Ishii H, Uetani T, et al. Impact of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Cardiol 2017;69:383–388.
crossref pmid
18. Wang C, Guo X, Xu X, et al. Association between sarcopenia and frailty in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2023;14:1855–1864.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Beberashvili I, Azar A, Sinuani I, et al. Geriatric nutritional risk index, muscle function, quality of life and clinical outcome in hemodialysis patients. Clin Nutr 2016;35:1522–1529.
crossref pmid
20. Palmer K, Vetrano DL, Marengoni A, et al. The relationship between anaemia and frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Nutr Health Aging 2018;22:965–974.
crossref pmid pdf
21. Chang PK, Chao YP, Wu LW. Proteinuria as a nascent predictor of frailty among people with metabolic syndrome: a retrospective observational study. Front Public Health 2022;10:847533.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Cherney DZ, Dagogo-Jack S, McGuire DK, et al. Kidney outcomes using a sustained ≥40% decline in eGFR: a meta-analysis of SGLT2 inhibitor trials. Clin Cardiol 2021;44:1139–1143.
crossref pmid pmc
23. EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group, Herrington WG, Staplin N, et al. Long-term effects of empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2025;392:777–787.
crossref pmid
24. EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group. Impact of primary kidney disease on the effects of empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease: secondary analyses of the EMPA-KIDNEY trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024;12:51–60.
crossref pmid
25. Fujisawa T, Suzuki S, Arita T, et al. Decline in eGFR over time and incidence of cardiovascular events: Shinken database analysis. J Cardiol 2021;77:626–633.
crossref pmid
26. The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group, Herrington WG, Staplin N, et al. Empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2023;388:117–127.
crossref pmid
27. Vart P, Butt JH, Jongs N, et al. Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease across the spectrum of frailty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2024;79:glad181.
crossref pmid pdf
28. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Diabetes Work Group. KDIGO 2022 clinical practice guideline for diabetes management in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2022;102(5S):S1–S127.
crossref pmid
29. Aldafas R, Crabtree T, Alkharaiji M, Vinogradova Y, Idris I. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2) in frail or older people with type 2 diabetes and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2024;53:afad254.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
30. Norman K, Haß U, Pirlich M. Malnutrition in older adults-recent advances and remaining challenges. Nutrients 2021;13:2764.
crossref pmid pmc
31. Piccoli GB, Cederholm T, Avesani CM, et al. Nutritional status and the risk of malnutrition in older adults with chronic kidney disease: implications for low protein intake and nutritional care: a critical review endorsed by ERN-ERA and ESPEN. Clin Nutr 2023;42:443–457.
crossref pmid
32. van der Hoek S, Koomen JV, van Bommel EJ, et al. Exposure-response analysis of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors dapagliflozin and empagliflozin on kidney hemodynamics in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Pers Med 2023;13:747.
crossref pmid pmc
33. Haller C. Hypoalbuminemia in renal failure: pathogenesis and therapeutic considerations. Kidney Blood Press Res 2005;28:307–310.
crossref pmid pdf
34. Nakagaito M, Imamura T, Ushijima R, Nakamura M, Kinugawa K. Predictors and outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitor discontinuation in a real-world population after hospitalization for heart failure. Biomedicines 2023;11:876.
crossref pmid pmc
35. Lunati ME, Cimino V, Gandolfi A, et al. SGLT2-inhibitors are effective and safe in the elderly: the SOLD study. Pharmacol Res 2022;183:106396.
crossref pmid
36. Goldman A, Fishman B, Twig G, et al. The real-world safety profile of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors among older adults (≥ 75 years): a retrospective, pharmacovigilance study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2023;22:16.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
37. Sano M, Goto S. Possible mechanism of hematocrit elevation by sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and associated beneficial renal and cardiovascular effects. Circulation 2019;139:1985–1987.
crossref pmid
38. Packer M. Alleviation of anemia by SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with CKD: mechanisms and results of long-term placebo-controlled trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2023;19:531–534.
crossref pmid pmc
39. Murashima M, Tanaka T, Kasugai T, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and anemia among diabetes patients in real clinical practice. J Diabetes Investig 2022;13:638–646.
crossref pmid pdf
40. Xie L, Shao X, Yu Y, et al. Anemia is a risk factor for rapid eGFR decline in type 2 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023;14:1052227.
crossref pmid pmc
41. Rossert J, Froissart M. Role of anemia in progression of chronic kidney disease. Semin Nephrol 2006;26:283–289.
crossref pmid


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#301, (Miseung Bldg.) 23, Apgujenog-ro 30-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06022, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3486-8736    Fax: +82-2-3486-8737    E-mail: registry@ksn.or.kr                

Copyright © 2026 by The Korean Society of Nephrology.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer