Impact of albuminuria on early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus: a nationwide population-based study

Article information

Korean J Nephrol. 2023;.j.krcp.22.278
Publication date (electronic) : 2023 December 11
doi : https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.22.278
1Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji University Medical Center, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
2Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong, Republic of Korea
3Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
4Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
5Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
6Transplantation Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
7Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
8Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
9Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Correspondence: Yaerim Kim Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, 1035 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea. E-mail: yaerim86@dsmc.or.kr
Correspondence: Kyungdo Han Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Soongsil University, 369 Sangdo-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea. E-mail: hkd@ssu.ac.kr
*Yaerim Kim and Kyungdo Han contributed equally to this study as co-corresponding authors.
Received 2022 November 25; Revised 2023 June 22; Accepted 2023 July 11.

Abstract

Background

Early-onset diabetes mellitus has a significant lifetime burden and is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Since insulin resistance is one of the mechanisms of podocyte injury, we aimed to evaluate the effect of albuminuria on newly developed early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

We screened 6,891,399 subjects aged ≥20 and <40 years without a history of prediabetes or diabetes from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database between 2009 and 2012. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify the impact of albuminuria on early-onset T2DM.

Results

Among a total of 5,383,779 subjects, 62,148 subjects (1.2%) developed early-onset diabetes over 7.3 ± 1.2 years. Albuminuria was significantly associated with early-onset T2DM (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55–1.70) after adjustment for age, sex, anthropometric data, physical exercise status, serum glucose, and total cholesterol. The risk of early-onset T2DM increased more in subjects with more components of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Among each component of MetS, hypertriglyceridemia was prominently associated with early-onset T2DM (aHR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.81–2.25) in subjects with albuminuria.

Conclusion

Dipstick albuminuria was significantly associated with early-onset T2DM in young adult populations. Close monitoring of albuminuria is warranted for disease risk modification, especially in subjects with MetS.

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in young adults has recently increased worldwide. Even though prevalence varies widely by region and ethnicity, increasing trends have been commonly observed. Early-onset T2DM, defined as the onset of diabetes before the age of 40 years, is clinically crucial because of the increased lifetime burden of higher morbidity and mortality compared to that in late-onset diabetic patients [13]. Furthermore, as a multisystemic disease, individuals with early-onset T2DM usually suffer from a higher risk of complications and a higher socioeconomic burden [4].

Albuminuria is a well-established marker representing kidney damage. Additionally, albuminuria is a marker of endothelial dysfunction, which leads to the increased transcapillary escape of albumin, triggering an inflammatory reaction in the vessel wall [5]. In this regard, even a small amount of urinary albumin excretion represents kidney damage and is also used as a diagnostic criterion of diabetic kidney disease [6,7]. Above all, the prevalence of microalbuminuria in early-onset T2DM is linked to the high rate of progression to macroalbuminuria and macrovascular complications [810].

It has been reported that local insulin-receptor signaling occurs in the podocytes of the kidney, which is one of the target organs of insulin action [11,12]. Insulin resistance, the primary pathophysiological process of diabetes, correlates with the function of cells such as podocytes and endothelial cells that make up the glomerular filtration barrier [13]. Moreover, insulin resistance deteriorated more in individuals with early-onset diabetes than in individuals with late-onset diabetes [14]. Therefore, albuminuria has a role as a predisposing factor for the development of diabetes, especially for young adult populations. A previous cross-sectional study revealed that microalbuminuria was closely correlated with metabolic syndrome (MetS) [15]. In addition, microalbuminuria significantly increased the risk of T2DM in subjects with metabolic diseases such as MetS or impaired glucose tolerance [2,16].

Considering the significance of lifetime disease burden in the young population, we aimed to evaluate the impact of albuminuria as a predictive factor for the early diagnosis of T2DM in this special population. Additionally, we tried to evaluate the impact of the components of MetS on the development of early-onset T2DM in this study.

Methods

Ethical considerations

This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital approved this study (No. E-2107-186-1237). The attending government organization approved this study using the data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS; No. NHIS-2021-1-592). The subject data were anonymized and de-identified for the analysis, so the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Study population and clinical parameters

We extracted data from populations aged ≥20 and <40 years who underwent health check-ups during 2009 and 2012. Among all subjects, we excluded subjects with diabetes or a history of prediabetes. The subjects were divided into subgroups according to age of 30 years, sex, the number of components of MetS, and the status of each component of MetS.

Data acquisition and definitions

All data, including anthropometric data, laboratory results, and diagnostic information, were obtained from the Korean NHIS database. Exposure was one or more instances of the presence of albuminuria ≥1+ in dipstick urinalysis in health examination results. The development of diabetes or prediabetes during follow-up periods from 2010 to 2018 was regarded as a primary outcome. Diabetes was defined by the diagnostic codes E11 to E14 based on the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) code, oral hypoglycemic agent use or insulin prescription, and fasting glucose of ≥126 mg/dL. Prediabetes was defined by the diagnostic code R730 and fasting glucose of ≥100 and <126 mg/dL. MetS was defined when three or more of the following components were present: increased waist circumference (≥90 cm for male and ≥80 cm for female); elevated triglyceride level (≥150 mg/dL) or use of a relevant drug; reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (<40 mg/dL for male and 50 mg/dL for female) or use of a relevant drug; and elevated blood pressure (systolic, ≥130 mmHg and/or diastolic, ≥80 mmHg) or use of antihypertensive medication. According to the inclusion criteria, no subject showed an increased fasting glucose level of ≥100 mg/dL or the use of an antidiabetic drug. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined when the estimated glomerular filtration rate was under 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, calculated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Dyslipidemia was defined with the ICD-10 diagnostic code, E78 and a history of lipid‐lowering drug use or a total serum cholesterol concentration of ≥240 mg/dL in the health examination results.

Statistical analysis

All continuous variables are presented as the mean with standard deviation. Categorical variables are shown as a number of subjects with percentages. We used the Student t test and the chi-square test to compare the two groups. Two-sided p-values were derived, and the significance level was set at 0.05. We used the Cox proportional hazards regression model for risk assessment for the development of diabetes or prediabetes. We adjusted the following variables: age, sex, income status, residence, exercise, smoking status, alcohol consumption status, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, serum glucose, total cholesterol, and comorbidities, including hypertension and dyslipidemia. The incidence rate was calculated by the number of events per 1,000 person-years. The SAS 9.4 program (SAS Institute) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Study populations

A total of 5,383,779 subjects were finally included in the analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1, available online). In the comparison of subjects according to the presence of albuminuria, subjects with albuminuria showed more healthy characteristics in anthropometric data such as BMI and waist circumferences compared to the subjects without albuminuria. However, the prevalence of comorbidities such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and CKD was higher in subjects with albuminuria. A comparison of the baseline characteristics is shown in Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

Impact of albuminuria on the development of early-onset type 2 diabetes

A total of 62,148 subjects (1.2%) were diagnosed with diabetes during 87.8 ± 13.9 months of follow-up. Albuminuria was significantly associated with early-onset T2DM development (Fig. 1). The significance was maintained even after adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and laboratory results (Table 2). Further sensitivity analysis had been performed among the subjects who were aged ≥20 and <40 years, at the time of the disease development. Albuminuria was significantly associated with early-onset T2DM (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54–1.74) and the results were consistent after the multivariate adjustments (Supplementary Table 1, available online). The impact of albuminuria on the increased development of early-onset T2DM was more prominent in males (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.47–2.74) than in females (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.56–1.88) (Supplementary Table 2, available online). According to MetS status, albuminuria was significantly associated with risk of early-onset T2DM in subjects with the same number of MetS components (Table 3). Moreover, the impact of albuminuria was prominent in subjects with ≥3 MetS components (aHR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.63–1.87) after adjustment for such variables (Table 3).

Figure 1.

Cumulative risk of early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the presence of albuminuria.

Risk of albuminuria on the development of early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus

Risk of albuminuria on the development of early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the number of metabolic syndrome components (MetS)

Impact of exposure duration of albuminuria on the development of early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus

Among 2,730,791 subjects who underwent two or more health exams, 30,428 and 5,224 subjects showed new-onset and persistent albuminuria, respectively. The interval duration between the first and second exams was 1.69 ± 0.51 years. According to the exposure duration, persistent exposure to albuminuria showed the highest association for the development of early-onset T2DM (aHR, 2.49; 95% CI, 2.12–2.92). Moreover, new-onset albuminuria was significantly associated with early-onset T2DM (aHR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.45–1.79) (Supplementary Table 3, available online).

Impact of metabolic syndrome on the development of early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus

In subjects with albuminuria, the number of MetS components also increased the risk of early-onset T2DM (Supplementary Fig. 2, available online). Subjects who developed early-onset T2DM showed a higher prevalence for each component of MetS compared to the subjects who didn’t develop diabetes (Supplementary Table 4, available online). Compared to the subjects without any components of MetS, the risk of diabetes was 5.33 times (95% CI, 4.38–6.50) increased in subjects with ≥3 MetS components (Fig. 2). Among each component of MetS, abnormalities in lipid profiles increased the risk of early-onset T2DM more than other components of MetS (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Risk of early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the number of MetS components and the status of each MetS component.

For the analyses of the number of MetS components, subjects without any component of MetS were regarded as a reference. For the analyses of each component of MetS, subjects with normal values were regarded as a reference group. The results were adjusted for age, sex, income status, place of residence, exercise, smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index, hypertension, dyslipidemia, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, serum glucose, and total cholesterol.

HDL, high-density lipoprotein; MetS, metabolic syndrome.

Discussion

In this study, we found that albuminuria was significantly associated with early-onset T2DM irrespective of age, sex, and the presence of MetS. The risk of early-onset T2DM was more prominent in subjects with a higher number of MetS components or more prolonged exposure to albuminuria. Among subjects with albuminuria, all components of MetS were associated with early-onset T2DM, but problems with lipid profiles conspicuously increased the risk of T2DM.

The onset age of diabetes is a critical indicator of prognosis [2]. Unlike traditional diabetes that develops in elderly individuals, early-onset T2DM has a considerably high risk of complications and mortality and enormous socioeconomic burdens [4]. These effects could be related to the duration of diabetes, which significantly increases the risk of microvascular and macrovascular events and death [17]. Moreover, early-onset T2DM is related to a lower threshold for insulin resistance; early-onset T2DM was also associated with hyperglycemia, obesity, MetS, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [18]. Therefore, early diagnosis and management of young-onset diabetes are crucial to improve prognosis.

The hazard of the presence of albuminuria in diabetic patients is well-established. However, the role and effect of albuminuria as a diagnostic factor have not yet been well evaluated. Among many factors related to the pathophysiology of albuminuria, podocyte injury plays a critical role irrespective of diabetes. Especially as an insulin sensitizer, deficiency of insulin receptors in podocytes is closely linked to the pathologic change similar to diabetic nephropathy even in the absence of diabetes [12]. Likewise, dysregulated insulin responses in podocytes led to podocyte damage and contributed to the development of albuminuria [19].

In addition, albuminuria plays a role as a marker of inflammation and oxidative stress [20]. Albuminuria is a well-recognized sign of kidney disease and an independent risk factor for the progression of kidney dysfunction [21,22]. Inflammation and oxidative stress are also linked to insulin resistance [23]. In this study, we could not determine the state of insulin resistance. Nevertheless, we suggest that insulin resistance, as a pathogenic driver of such metabolic diseases, including obesity, MetS, and diabetes, is closely linked to the presence of albuminuria, even in an euglycemic state. Thus, as an early marker representing the development of diabetes, albuminuria may have a role as a relative factor involved in the early onset of the development of diabetes and may have an impact on the progression of comorbidities of diabetes.

Albuminuria is an independent risk factor for adverse cardiovascular events and an increase in all-cause mortality [24]. Moreover, previous reports demonstrated that persistent albuminuria was associated with an increased risk of CVDs and overall mortality [25,26]. Albuminuria is an indicator of damage to the glomerular filtration barrier [27]. Increased amounts of albuminuria may dysregulate the glomerular pores and aggravate the damage of glomerular filtration barriers [28]. Regarding the deleterious effects on glomerular structures, persistently exposed albuminuria may have contributed to organ damage and led to the development of systemic diseases. In addition to the presence of albuminuria, persistently detected albuminuria in repeated exams significantly increased the risk of diabetes development in this study. To minimize the harmful impact of persistent albuminuria on adverse outcomes, repeated measurements and continual follow-up examinations of albuminuria are essential.

MetS is a major risk factor for the development of diabetes. Indeed, diabetic patients showed a higher prevalence of all components of MetS. The impact of albuminuria on newly developed early-onset T2DM was incrementally increased according to the number of MetS components in this study. This impact of MetS status was more prominent in subjects with albuminuria. Among subjects with albuminuria, dyslipidemia, including higher triglyceride and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, resulted in an increased risk of early-onset T2DM. Considering the enormous effort to identify manageable factors to reduce the risk of the development of CKD and CVD, the main comorbidities related to diabetes, this information that all components of MetS are manageable could be valuable.

Proper detection of albuminuria is critical for reducing private medical and socioeconomic burdens after a diagnosis of T2DM. As a result, annual screening for albuminuria is usually recommended in the guidelines [29]. Likewise, screening for albuminuria to predict diabetes could be suggested to reduce these burdens in the general population. Dipstick albuminuria is a simple and easily accessible tool to be used in primary clinics. Therefore, it may provide the opportunity for clinicians to identify the young population at risk of T2DM and improve the prognosis among young patients through early intervention. Considering the cost-related factors of lifelong diabetes in the young population, albuminuria in the young population, especially those with MetS, should be cautiously monitored. From the present study, we expect to detect the population at risk of early-onset T2DM to intervene in advance.

This study is valuable in showing the significance of albuminuria to be used as a diagnostic marker to assist early diagnosis of new-onset diabetes, especially early-onset T2DM among the young population. Nevertheless, there are several concerns to be discussed. First, this study was performed based on an observational cohort study; it was difficult to identify the causal relationship between albuminuria and new-onset T2DM. This study could be background epidemiological evidence to perform a further investigation to reveal the pathophysiological evidence of albuminuria as a predisposing risk factor for the development of diabetes is necessary. Although the prevalence of young-onset diabetes was widely different according to region and ethnicity, this study included only single-nation populations. Third, we used dipstick urinalysis to measure albuminuria rather than quantitative methods. This method could not indicate the impact of the exact amount of albuminuria, but it was a more convenient and inexpensive approach as a screening tool. Moreover, prediabetes was defined with the diagnostic code and the definition of impaired fasting glucose. Due to the absence of the results of the oral glucose tolerance test, some subjects with impaired glucose tolerance without the diagnostic code may have been excluded.

Albuminuria, detected using dipstick urinalysis, is an excellent parameter to assist risk stratification and early diagnosis of new-onset T2DM in young populations. Given the longer life expectancy of these special populations and the greater disease burden of T2DM, physicians need to consider that screening of albuminuria would be a guaranteed method to obtain a chance for early diagnosis of the disease and to have an opportunity to intervene earlier.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Young Investigator Research Grant from the Korean Nephrology Research Foundation (2021). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, or decision to submit for publication.

Data sharing statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology: SL, YK

Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation: SC, GNN, JC, SGK, MK, HH, SL, KH

Resources: EK, SP, JHP, WYP, KJ, SH, KWJ

Supervision: KH, DKK

Writing - original draft preparation: SL, YK

Writing - review & editing: EK, SP, JHP, WYP, KJ, SH, KWJ

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

1. Huo L, Magliano DJ, Rancière F, et al. Impact of age at diagnosis and duration of type 2 diabetes on mortality in Australia 1997-2011. Diabetologia 2018;61:1055–1063.
2. Hu C, Lin L, Zhu Y, et al. Association between age at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases: a nationwide, population-based, cohort study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:717069.
3. Al-Saeed AH, Constantino MI, Molyneaux L, et al. An inverse relationship between age of type 2 diabetes onset and complication risk and mortality: the impact of youth-onset type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016;39:823–829.
4. Magliano DJ, Sacre JW, Harding JL, Gregg EW, Zimmet PZ, Shaw JE. Young-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus: implications for morbidity and mortality. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2020;16:321–331.
5. Stehouwer CD. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetic nephropathy: state of the art and potential significance for non-diabetic renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:778–781.
6. Viberti GC, Yip-Messent J, Morocutti A. Diabetic nephropathy: future avenue. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1216–1225.
7. Marshall SM. Clinical features and management of diabetic nephropathy. In : Pickup JC, William G, eds. Textbook of diabetes 3rd edth ed. Blackwell Science Publishers; 2003.
8. Yoo EG, Choi IK, Kim DH. Prevalence of microalbuminuria in young patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2004;17:1423–1427.
9. Pinhas-Hamiel O, Zeitler P. Acute and chronic complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents. Lancet 2007;369:1823–1831.
10. Chan AT, Tang SC. Advances in the management of diabetic kidney disease: beyond sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2022;41:682–698.
11. Coward RJ, Welsh GI, Yang J, et al. The human glomerular podocyte is a novel target for insulin action. Diabetes 2005;54:3095–3102.
12. Welsh GI, Hale LJ, Eremina V, et al. Insulin signaling to the glomerular podocyte is critical for normal kidney function. Cell Metab 2010;12:329–340.
13. Fornoni A. Proteinuria, the podocyte, and insulin resistance. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2068–2069.
14. Song SH, Hardisty CA. Early-onset Type 2 diabetes mellitus: an increasing phenomenon of elevated cardiovascular risk. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2008;6:315–322.
15. Saadi MM, Roy MN, Haque R, Tania FA, Mahmood S, Ali N. Association of microalbuminuria with metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. BMC Endocr Disord 2020;20:153.
16. Halimi JM, Bonnet F, Lange C, et al. Urinary albumin excretion is a risk factor for diabetes mellitus in men, independently of initial metabolic profile and development of insulin resistance: the DESIR Study. J Hypertens 2008;26:2198–2206.
17. Zoungas S, Woodward M, Li Q, et al. Impact of age, age at diagnosis and duration of diabetes on the risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications and death in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2014;57:2465–2474.
18. Ormazabal V, Nair S, Elfeky O, Aguayo C, Salomon C, Zuñiga FA. Association between insulin resistance and the development of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2018;17:122.
19. Lay AC, Coward RJ. The evolving importance of insulin signaling in podocyte health and disease. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2018;9:693.
20. Toblli JE, Bevione P, Di Gennaro F, Madalena L, Cao G, Angerosa M. Understanding the mechanisms of proteinuria: therapeutic implications. Int J Nephrol 2012;2012:546039.
21. Tryggvason K, Pettersson E. Causes and consequences of proteinuria: the kidney filtration barrier and progressive renal failure. J Intern Med 2003;254:216–224.
22. Jun J, Park K, Lee HS, et al. Clinical relevance of postoperative proteinuria for prediction of early renal outcomes after kidney transplantation. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2022;41:707–716.
23. Imai Y, Dobrian AD, Weaver JR, et al. Interaction between cytokines and inflammatory cells in islet dysfunction, insulin resistance and vascular disease. Diabetes Obes Metab 2013;15 Suppl 3:117–129.
24. Gerstein HC, Mann JF, Yi Q, et al. Albuminuria and risk of cardiovascular events, death, and heart failure in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. JAMA 2001;286:421–426.
25. Messent JW, Elliott TG, Hill RD, Jarrett RJ, Keen H, Viberti GC. Prognostic significance of microalbuminuria in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a twenty-three year follow-up study. Kidney Int 1992;41:836–839.
26. Deckert T, Kofoed-Enevoldsen A, Nørgaard K, Borch-Johnsen K, Feldt-Rasmussen B, Jensen T. Microalbuminuria: implications for micro- and macrovascular disease. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1181–1191.
27. Raja P, Maxwell AP, Brazil DP. The potential of albuminuria as a biomarker of diabetic complications. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2021;35:455–466.
28. Gagliardini E, Conti S, Benigni A, Remuzzi G, Remuzzi A. Imaging of the porous ultrastructure of the glomerular epithelial filtration slit. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;21:2081–2089.
29. Molitch ME, DeFronzo RA, Franz MJ, et al. Diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Care 2003;26 Suppl 1:S94–S98.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Cumulative risk of early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the presence of albuminuria.

Figure 2.

Risk of early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the number of MetS components and the status of each MetS component.

For the analyses of the number of MetS components, subjects without any component of MetS were regarded as a reference. For the analyses of each component of MetS, subjects with normal values were regarded as a reference group. The results were adjusted for age, sex, income status, place of residence, exercise, smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index, hypertension, dyslipidemia, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, serum glucose, and total cholesterol.

HDL, high-density lipoprotein; MetS, metabolic syndrome.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic Total Albuminuria– Albuminuria+ p-value
No. of patients 5,383,779 5,302,542 81,237
Age (yr) 30.6 ± 5.0 30.8 ± 5.0 30.1 ± 5.1 <0.001
 20–30 2,406,444 (44.7) 2,366,678 (44.6) 39,766 (49.0) <0.001
 ≥30 2,977,335 (55.3) 2,935,864 (55.4) 41,471 (51.0)
Male sex 3,033,023 (56.3) 2,995,476 (56.5) 37,547 (46.2) <0.001
Smoke <0.001
 Non 3,079,319 (57.2) 3,028,238 (57.1) 51,081 (62.9)
 Ex 531,395 (9.9) 524,143 (9.9) 7,252 (8.9)
 Current 1,773,065 (32.9) 1,750,161 (33.0) 22,904 (28.2)
Drink <0.001
 Non 2,094,152 (38.9) 2,060,371 (38.9) 33,781 (41.6)
 Mild 2,859,855 (53.1) 2,818,574 (53.1) 41,281 (50.8)
 Heavy 429,772 (8.0) 423,597 (8.0) 6,175 (7.6)
Regular exercise 685,015 (12.7) 674,105 (12.7) 10,910 (13.4) <0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2) 22.7 ± 3.47 22.7 ± 3.5 22.6 ± 4.0 <0.001
 <18.5 449,096 (8.3) 438,819 (8.3) 10,277 (12.7)
 <23 2,656,753 (49.3) 2,618,518 (49.4) 38,235 (47.1)
 <25 1,016,207 (18.9) 1,003,585 (18.9) 12,622 (15.5)
 <30 1,081,043 (20.1) 1,065,410 (20.1) 15,633 (19.2)
 ≥30 180,680 (3.4) 176,210 (3.3) 4,470 (5.5)
Waist circumference (cm) 76.7 ± 9.75 76.7 ± 9.7 75.9 ± 11.1 <0.001
SBP (mmHg) 116.7 ± 12.8 116.7 ± 12.8 117.4 ± 15.1 <0.001
DBP (mmHg) 73.1 ± 9.2 73.1 ± 9.2 74.0 ± 10.8 <0.001
Income low, ≤25 1,147,987 (21.3) 1,129,789 (21.3) 18,198 (22.4) <0.001
Place, urban 2,587,026 (48.1) 2,545,249 (48.0) 41,777 (51.4) <0.001
Hypertension 316,313 (5.9) 306,735 (5.8) 9,578 (11.8) <0.001
Dyslipidemia 304,907 (5.7) 297,568 (5.6) 7,339 (9.0) <0.001
Chronic kidney disease 141,149 (2.6) 137,255 (2.6) 3,894 (4.8) <0.001
Metabolic syndrome 274,563 (5.1) 268,005 (5.1) 6,558 (8.1) <0.001
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 182.6 ± 32.8 182.5 ± 32.8 186.1 ± 36.2 <0.001
HDL-C (mg/dL) 57.8 ± 22.2 57.8 ± 22.2 59.1 ± 18.7 <0.001
LDL-C (mg/dL) 103.7 ± 33.9 103.6 ± 33.9 105.4 ± 33.6 <0.001
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 91.9 (91.8–91.9) 91.9 (91.9–91.9) 89.5 (89.2–89.9) <0.001
Glucose (mg/dL) 86.3 ± 7.8 86.3 ± 7.8 86.0 ± 8.0 <0.001
GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 96.7 ± 51.3 96.7 ± 51.4 93.0 ± 39.5 <0.001
Follow-up (mo) 87.8 ± 13.9 87.8 ± 13.9 87.1 ± 14.8 <0.001

Data are expressed as number only, mean ± standard deviation, number (%), or geometric mean (95% confidence interval).

DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Table 2.

Risk of albuminuria on the development of early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus

Albuminuria No. of subjects No. of events IR Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
HR (95% CI) p-value aHR (95% CI) p-value aHR (95% CI) p-value aHR (95% CI) p-value
<1+ 5,302,542 60,208 1.55 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
≥1+ 81,237 1,940 3.29 2.13 (2.04–2.23) <0.001 2.33 (2.23–2.44) <0.001 2.15 (2.05–2.25) <0.001 1.62 (1.55–1.70) <0.001

Model 1, non-adjusted; Model 2, adjusted with age, sex; Model 3, adjusted with variables in model 2 and income status, residual place, exercise, smoking, drinking, body mass index; Model 4, adjusted with variables in model 3 and hypertension, dyslipidemia, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, serum glucose, total cholesterol.

aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IR, incidence rate per 1,000 persons.

Table 3.

Risk of albuminuria on the development of early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the number of metabolic syndrome components (MetS)

No. of MetS (albuminuria) Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
HR (95% CI) p-value for interaction aHR (95% CI) p-value for interaction aHR (95% CI) p-value for interaction aHR (95% CI) p-value for interaction
0 (<1+) Reference <0.001 Reference <0.001 Reference <0.001 Reference 0.108
0 (≥1+) 1.29 (1.13–1.48) 1.38 (1.20–1.58) 1.43 (1.24–1.64) 1.41 (1.23–1.62)
1–2 (<1+) Reference Reference Reference Reference
1–2 (≥1+) 1.86 (1.74–1.99) 1.92 (1.80–2.06) 1.85 (1.73–1.98) 1.65 (1.54–1.76)
≥3 (<1+) Reference Reference Reference Reference
≥3 (≥1+) 2.18 (2.04–2.34) 2.17 (2.02–2.32) 2.01 (1.88–2.16) 1.74 (1.63–1.87)

Model 1, non-adjusted; Model 2, adjusted with age, sex; Model 3, adjusted with variables in model 2 and income status, residual place, exercise, smoking, drinking, body mass index; Model 4, adjusted with variables in model 3 and hypertension, dyslipidemia, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, serum glucose, total cholesterol.

aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.