Asymptomatic hematuria in children: Korean Society of Pediatric Nephrology recommendations for diagnosis and management

Asymptomatic hematuria in children

Article information

Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2024;43(5):565-574

Publication date (electronic) : 2024 March 7

doi : https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.23.231

Eujin Park ¹

, Sang Woon Kim ²

, Su Jin Kim ³

, Minki Baek ⁴

, Yo Han Ahn ⁵^,⁶

, Eun Mi Yang ⁷

, Myung Hyun Cho ⁸

, Hyun Kyung Lee ⁹

, Kyoung Hee Han ¹⁰

, Yae Lim Kim ¹¹

, Miyoung Choi ¹²

, Hee Gyung Kang^,⁵^,⁶^,^*

, Jin-Soon Suh^,¹³^,^*

, on behalf of the Hematuria Guideline Development Group

¹Department of Pediatrics, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

²Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

³Department of Pediatrics, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea

⁴Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

⁵Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children’s Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

⁶Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

⁷Department of Pediatrics, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea

⁸Department of Pediatrics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea

⁹Department of Pediatrics, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

¹⁰Department of Pediatrics, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Republic of Korea

¹¹Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

¹²Division for Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Republic of Korea

¹³Department of Pediatrics, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Correspondence: Hee Gyung Kang Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children’s Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea. E-mail: kanghg@snu.ac.kr

Jin-Soon Suh Department of Pediatrics, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, 327 Sosa-ro, Bucheon 14647, Republic of Korea. E-mail: rebekahjs@catholic.ac.kr

*Hee Gyung Kang and Jin-Soon Suh equally contributed to this study.

Received 2023 September 1; Revised 2023 November 1; Accepted 2023 November 12.

Abstract

Hematuria is a relatively common condition among school-aged children. Because international guidelines for asymptomatic hematuria in children are unavailable, developing practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic hematuria based on scientific evidence while considering real-world practice settings, values, and patient and physician preferences is essential. The Korean Society of Pediatric Nephrology developed clinical guidelines to address key questions regarding the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic hematuria in children.

Keywords: Evidence-based practice; GRADE approach; Guideline; Hematuria; Practice guideline

Introduction

South Korea has implemented mass urine screening for elementary, middle, and high school students since 1998 under the School Health Act. Urinalysis detects occult blood, urine proteins, and urine glucose. Occult blood, indicating possible hematuria, is the most common reason for pediatric visits to doctors. Hematuria is the presence of blood in the urine, defined as five or more red blood cells (RBCs) per high power field (HPF) of view (×400) [1,2]. Even if the urine is red in color or the urine dipstick detects urinary occult blood, the urine may not contain RBCs; therefore, a microscopic examination is required to confirm hematuria. If the color of the urine appears red or dark due to hematuria, it is called gross hematuria, and if the color of the urine does not change but hematuria is visible under a microscope, it is called microscopic hematuria. In general, hematuria has clinical significance when hematuria persists on three or more urine microscopic examinations 2 weeks apart (persistent hematuria). When microscopic hematuria is not accompanied by proteinuria (defined as a single voided urine protein-creatinine ratio greater than 0.2 for patients aged 2 years or older and 0.5 for those under 2 years), it is called isolated microscopic hematuria [1]. Hematuria is a relatively common condition found in 0.2% to 6.0% of school-aged children [3]. Asymptomatic persistent hematuria in children should be differentiated through careful history-taking, including medical and family history; physical examination, including blood pressure measurement and growth assessment; blood and urine tests; and imaging studies, such as kidney and bladder ultrasound, if indicated. Children with abnormalities in this initial assessment should be referred to a pediatric nephrologist or urologist for further evaluation, and follow-up is recommended, even for children without obvious abnormalities [4,5] (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Initial diagnostic process for children with persistent asymptomatic hematuria.

ANA, antinuclear antibodies; ANCA, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; anti-dsDNA, anti-double-stranded DNA; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; HBV, hepatitis B virus.

Owing to the lack of practical guidelines for asymptomatic hematuria in children, the Korean Society of Pediatric Nephrology (KSPN) convened a multidisciplinary guideline development committee consisting of pediatric nephrologists, pediatric urologists, and methodology experts with a genuine interest in hematuria. Therefore, this recommendation is intended primarily for undiagnosed patients under 18 years of age for whom the cause of asymptomatic hematuria is currently being determined or for whom no cause has been found after differential diagnosis, and to help clinicians involved in the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic hematuria make evidence-based clinical decisions. The key questions were selected by reviewing existing guidelines, selecting clinical issues, reviewing evidence, and discussing each topic in the development committee. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology was used to assess the level of evidence. Recommendations were provided by reviewing the latest evidence on key questions regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of asymptomatic hematuria in children.

Methods

These guidelines were developed based on an adaptation of existing guidelines. For adaptive development, we used existing guidelines as the most important source of evidence, added the latest research results, and modified them to adapt to the healthcare situation in Korea. In addition, the “de novo” method was selectively reviewed when recommendations could not be found in existing guidelines. However, of the eight key questions selected, only two had existing guidelines that fit the target population; therefore, we applied a new creation method. Considering the expertise, representativeness, and continuity of practice guideline development, the KSPN established a practice guideline development committee. The guideline development committee organized a development working group and review committee consisting of pediatric nephrologists, pediatric urologists, and methodology experts. Conflict of interest disclosures were collected from all members of the guideline development committee prior to their participation in guideline development to identify financial and nonfinancial conflicts of interest. Details of the guideline development process are summarized in the Supplementary Materials (available online).

Key questions and recommendations

All key questions and recommendations regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of asymptomatic hematuria in children are summarized in Table 1, and details of the evidence supporting each recommendation are described below.

Table 1.

Summary of recommendations

Key question 1: What imaging tests should be performed to diagnose the cause of asymptomatic hematuria?

Background

International guidelines recommend kidney and bladder ultrasound for pediatric patients with microscopic hematuria and proteinuria, asymptomatic gross hematuria, or suspected nephrolithiasis. Guidelines state that if microscopic hematuria persists without a clear cause, kidney and bladder ultrasound may be considered [6,7]. Although, ultrasound is frequently performed in clinical practice for children with asymptomatic hematuria, its limitations—sensitivity and specificity can vary depending on the operator—have prompted debate regarding whether computed tomography (CT) should be performed. Because guidelines on the effectiveness of imaging modalities for asymptomatic hematuria in children are lacking, this Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) question was intended to initiate a review of the effectiveness or risk of CT compared with ultrasound in children with asymptomatic hematuria.

Recommendations

1-1. For asymptomatic gross hematuria, kidney and bladder ultrasonography is recommended.

(Level of evidence: Low, Recommendation grade: A, strong recommendation)

1-2. If asymptomatic microscopic hematuria of no known cause persists, kidney and bladder ultrasound may be considered.

(Level of evidence: Low, Recommendation grade: B, conditional recommendation)

Summary of evidence

Imaging could detect conditions including nephrolithiasis, congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, cystic kidney disease, kidney and bladder tumors, and nutcracker syndrome in children with asymptomatic hematuria. Ultrasound is recommended as the first imaging test when nephrolithiasis is clinically suspected [6,7]. However, ultrasonography has a sensitivity of 67% to 83% and a specificity of 78% to 97% in the diagnosis of nephrolithiasis, which is less accurate than CT, which has a sensitivity and specificity of >90%. Therefore, for diagnosing nephrolithiasis, non-contrast CT should be recommended in the presence of painful gross hematuria [8–11]. In contrast, congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, cystic kidney disease, and tumors of the kidneys and bladder are commonly detected by ultrasound. Doppler ultrasonography is recommended as the first imaging test when nutcracker syndrome is suspected [12]. One systematic review analyzed 736 patients with nutcracker syndrome and recommended ultrasound as an effective diagnostic imaging test, as 79% of patients were diagnosed using ultrasound [13]. The 2018 American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines recommended that children with gross hematuria be evaluated with ultrasound first and that ultrasound may also be considered if microscopic hematuria without proteinuria persists without an identified cause [14]. Ultrasound can be performed in pediatric patients with hematuria when the above conditions are suspected; however, owing to the low likelihood of disease detection, ultrasound is not recommended in all cases of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. Contrast CT may be considered if a tumor is diagnosed by ultrasound or if there is recurrent gross hematuria in the absence of abnormalities on kidney and bladder ultrasound. Non-contrast CT may be considered if nephrolithiasis is suspected. Ultrasonography is preferred over CT in pediatric patients with hematuria because of the risk of radiation exposure associated with CT. The ACR estimates that the effective dose of radiation with CT is 3 to 10 mSv, which is in the fourth of five of relative radiation level (annual dose limit of 1 mSv for the general population; the dose of 0.1–0.3 mSv per chest radiography) [6,11,14,15].

Key question 2: Should a kidney biopsy be performed if asymptomatic microscopic hematuria persists?

Background

International guidelines recommend kidney biopsy in the presence of glomerular hematuria or proteinuria. However, whether kidney biopsy should be performed in children with asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria is unclear [16]. This PICO question is intended to initiate a review of whether or not performing a kidney biopsy affects kidney outcomes in children with asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria.

Recommendations

2-1. Kidney biopsy is not recommended for children with persistent asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria of unknown etiology in the absence of other medical or family histories, symptoms, or signs.

(Level of evidence: Low, Recommendation grade: C, conditional against)

2-2. If persistent microscopic hematuria in children is accompanied by findings suggestive of chronic glomerular diseases such as proteinuria (albuminuria), hypertension, decreased kidney function, or nephropathy secondary to systemic disease, a kidney biopsy is recommended.

(Level of evidence: Low, Recommendation grade: A, strong recommendation)

Summary of evidence

Acute and chronic glomerulonephritis can be differentiated from persistent asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in children by a kidney biopsy. Nine studies have reported the results of kidney biopsies in patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria, including children [17–25]. The indications for kidney biopsy were hematuria lasting more than 6 months to 2 years, a family history of kidney disease, decreased serum complement, the presence of autoimmune antibodies, combined proteinuria, and gross hematuria. In 47% to 60% of patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria without proteinuria, the results of kidney biopsies were normal, and the diagnosed glomerular diseases included thin basement membrane disease (TBMD) (22%–59%), immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) (6%–50%), complement 3 glomerulonephritis (one case), and Alport syndrome (6%–22%) [18–26]. TBMD has recently been classified as autosomal dominant Alport syndrome; therefore, Alport syndrome and IgAN should be considered when deciding whether a kidney biopsy should be performed in an asymptomatic patient with microscopic hematuria [25,27].

Alport syndrome is treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Treatment is initiated immediately after diagnosis in patients with male X-linked or autosomal recessive Alport syndrome and when albuminuria, defined as a urine microalbumin-creatinine ratio greater than 30 mg/g, is observed in patients with female X-linked or autosomal dominant Alport syndrome. Clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Alport syndrome, published in Pediatric Nephrology in 2021 [26], recommend diagnosis by kidney biopsy or genetic testing to determine early treatment if glomerular hematuria persists for >6 months [15,25]. However, except in cases of pre-diagnosed Alport syndrome, treatment is usually initiated when albuminuria is present; hence, performing a diagnostic test is never considered late (kidney biopsy or genetic test) when albuminuria occurs. Furthermore, genetic testing is more sensitive and specific than kidney biopsies for the diagnosis of Alport syndrome in recent years. Therefore, genetic testing should be performed first, if possible.

In contrast, IgAN is treated with ACEi or ARB, and, if necessary, with immunosuppressive agents. Japanese clinical practice guidelines for IgAN state that in cases of hematuria without proteinuria or with trace proteinuria, kidney biopsy is optional, as the results of kidney biopsy rarely change the treatment plan but may be necessary for differentiation from Alport syndrome [28,29]. Therefore, biopsies are not always recommended for the differential diagnosis of IgAN in patients with asymptomatic isolated hematuria.

In conclusion, kidney biopsy is not recommended in the absence of findings suggestive of chronic glomerular disease in children with asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria. However, if there are findings suggestive of glomerular disease such as proteinuria (albuminuria), high blood pressure (defined as blood pressure above the 95th percentile for age and height for both boys and girls under the age of 13 years, or ≥130/80 mmHg for those 13 years and older), decreased kidney function, or nephropathy secondary to systemic disease, a kidney biopsy is necessary for an accurate diagnosis [30]. However, if a genetic disorder such as Alport syndrome is suspected, genetic testing may be performed first. Conservative treatment may be prioritized if there is a possibility of spontaneously resolving kidney disease, such as postinfectious glomerulonephritis.

Key question 3: Should cystoscopy be performed if asymptomatic hematuria persists?

Background

Current guidelines regarding microscopic hematuria in adult patients recommend that clinicians consider cystoscopy in patients with microscopic hematuria who are at low risk for genitourinary malignancies [31]. The usefulness of cystoscopy for identifying the cause of asymptomatic hematuria in children is unknown, with no current guidelines or recommendations. This PICO question was intended to examine whether or not performing cystoscopy in children with asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria causes differences in kidney outcomes.

Recommendations

3. Cystoscopy is not recommended for asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in children.

(Recommendation grade: Expert consensus)

Summary of evidence

Conditions that can be diagnosed using cystoscopy in patients with hematuria include inflammation, masses, stones, foreign bodies in the bladder and urethra, urethral strictures, urethral valves, and nutcracker syndrome [32]. A cystoscope allows doctors to look directly into the bladder and urethra to observe their structure and function, the condition of the mucous membranes, and the presence of tumors, stones, and foreign bodies. In cases of persistent gross hematuria of the bladder or urethra, cystoscopy can help identify the source of bleeding. Although cystoscopy can be used to check for inflammation of the bladder or urethral mucosa during urinary tract infections; however, it is not recommended owing to the risk of exacerbation of the inflammation. The openings of the ureteral orifice can be observed during cystoscopy, which also helps to identify the shape and number of ureteral orifices as well as how urine travels from the kidneys to the bladder. Hematuria through the ureteral orifice is present in the absence of lesions within the bladder and urethra, suggesting hematuria of the kidney and upper urinary tract origin. Cystoscopy may reveal hematuria coming through the left ureteral orifice in nutcracker syndrome [32].

To our knowledge, studies on cystoscopy in asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in children are lacking, and in a study of 136 patients with gross hematuria for whom cystoscopy was performed, no abnormalities were observed in 44% of the patients. Of the remaining patients with abnormalities, inflammatory findings in the bladder and urethra, posterior urethral valve, urethral stricture, and bladder mass were observed in 50, 10, 6, and four patients, respectively [33]. Moreover, the four malignancies identified using cystoscopy were also detected using ultrasound, and the authors noted that cystoscopy is not generally necessary to differentiate them; however, patients with persistent hematuria with no abnormalities detected by imaging studies may be considered for cystoscopy. Because cystoscopy is used in patients with asymptomatic hematuria to differentiate malignancy, and malignancies of the bladder are extremely rare in children [34], cystoscopy should be limited to patients with unremarkable imaging results but persistent gross hematuria at the discretion of the urologist.

Key question 4: Do patients with asymptomatic isolated hematuria of unknown etiology require medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or steroids?

Background

The effectiveness of the medications frequently prescribed to treat glomerular disorders in children with asymptomatic hematuria is uncertain. No studies have investigated how the use of ACEi, ARB, or steroids in children with asymptomatic isolated hematuria of unknown cause affects kidney function. Therefore, the authors reviewed studies that investigated the causes of hematuria in children with asymptomatic isolated microscopic or gross hematuria and sought to determine the proportion of causal conditions that required treatment with medications such as ACEi, ARB, or steroids. This PICO question is intended to determine whether or not the administration of ACEi, ARB, or steroids affects kidney outcomes in children with asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria.

Recommendations

4-1. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers is not recommended for patients with asymptomatic isolated hematuria of unknown etiology.

(Recommendation grade: Expert consensus)

4-2. Steroid treatment is not recommended for patients with asymptomatic isolated hematuria of unknown etiology.

(Recommendation grade: Expert consensus)

Summary of evidence

A systematic review of 857 children with asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria found no cause of hematuria in 57.6% of all patients, with the remainder attributed to Alport syndrome/TBMD (15.7%), IgAN (10.4%), hypercalciuria or nephrolithiasis (9.4%), or other causes (<3%) [35]. A study of 228 children with asymptomatic isolated gross hematuria found that the cause of hematuria could not be identified in 37.7% of cases. The confirmed causes included hypercalciuria or nephrolithiasis in 24.1%, IgAN in 15.8%, post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis in 9.2%, exercise-induced hematuria in 3.2%, and Alport syndrome/TBMD in 2.6% [26]. In these studies, IgAN and Alport syndrome/TBMD, both of which can or should be treated with medications, account for up to 16% of all cases of asymptomatic isolated hematuria.

The administration of ACEi and ARB can be beneficial for IgAN. The 2021 KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) recommendations suggest treatment with ACEi or ARB for all children with IgAN with proteinuria [16]. However, the Japanese Society of Nephrology’s 2020 clinical practice guidelines for IgAN recommends that in patients with proteinuria of less than 0.5 g/day, existing evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of ACEi or ARB is lacking. Therefore, medications should be prescribed based on pathologic findings, age, degree of hematuria, and the presence of hypertension [28]. In contrast, in IgAN, steroid treatment is reserved only for patients with proteinuria of greater than 1 g/day or mesangial hypercellularity [16]. We found no randomized controlled trials or clinical practice guidelines on the usefulness of steroid treatment for IgAN without proteinuria.

The 2020 practice guidelines for Alport syndrome recommend treatment in the presence of albuminuria in autosomal dominant Alport syndrome and female X-linked Alport syndrome, which are the most common forms [26]. In autosomal dominant Alport syndrome and female X-linked Alport syndrome, the efficacy of ACEi and ARB blockers before albuminuria develops is unknown. However, in male patients with X-linked and autosomal recessive Alport syndromes, treatment with ACEi or ARB is recommended even before proteinuria occurs.

Therefore, owing to the lack of evidence, treatment with ACEi or ARB for patients with asymptomatic isolated hematuria of unknown etiology is not recommended. In addition, the indication for steroid use is the development of severe proteinuria in patients with glomerulonephritis. Given the high incidence of side effects (stunted growth, overweight, hypertension, fractures, and elevated blood sugar) caused by steroid use, steroid therapy is not recommended for patients with asymptomatic isolated hematuria without a diagnosis of glomerular disease.

Key question 5: If asymptomatic isolated hematuria persists, should the patient be followed up regularly?

Background

International guidelines for follow-up plan for children with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria are unavailable. Japanese clinical practice guidelines recommend urinalysis four times in the first year, once or twice annually thereafter, and blood tests annually in children with asymptomatic hematuria of unknown etiology; however, they do not provide a clear rationale for this recommendation [36]. This PICO question was intended to examine whether regular follow-ups had an impact on kidney outcomes in children with asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria.

Recommendations

5. Children with persistent asymptomatic hematuria are recommended to be followed up regularly if the hematuria persists, even if the cause is unknown. Follow-up includes annual height, weight, blood pressure, urine microscopy, and urine protein quantification.

(Level of evidence: Low, Recommendation grade: B, conditional recommendation)

Summary of evidence

Although the long-term prognosis of children with asymptomatic hematuria is generally considered good [5], a literature search could not identify any randomized controlled trials or prospective observational studies of hematuria and long-term kidney outcomes in children. In a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Israel on the incidence of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in patients with persistent asymptomatic hematuria starting in adolescence at the age of 16 to 17 years with a mean follow-up of 22 years. The absolute risk of ESKD in the cohort was only 27.6 people per 100,000 (0.28%); however, the relative risk of developing ESKD was 17.9 times higher than in those without hematuria [37]. In addition, a Hungarian study followed 341 patients with persistent hematuria for at least 6 months and reported that 47 patients (13.8%) developed symptoms suggestive of glomerular disease and underwent kidney biopsy; 10.5% of the total patients showed a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate to 75 mL/min/1.73 m² or less, with a mortality rate of 0.58% [19]. A Chinese study followed patients with asymptomatic isolated hematuria for 2 to 10 years and found that 6% (13 of 215) had concomitant proteinuria, hypertension, and kidney damage [38]. In addition, a Taiwanese study, which has been implementing school urine screening since 1990, reported that before school urine screening, 100% of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis and approximately 50% of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis cases progressed to chronic kidney disease; however, after-school urine screening was started, 28.5% of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis cases were detected early and the patients maintained kidney function, and only 5% of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis progressed to ESKD within 10 years [20]. In a Korean study, kidney biopsies from 149 pediatric patients with persistent microscopic hematuria revealed histological abnormalities in 139 patients (93.3%), including TBMD, IgAN, IgA vasculitis, and Alport syndrome [39]. Therefore, even if the cause of hematuria is not identified during the initial diagnosis, if hematuria persists without resolution, chronic glomerular disease may be present, and symptoms such as proteinuria, high blood pressure, decreased kidney function, and growth retardation may appear later. Accordingly, regular follow-up is necessary for the development of new clinical symptoms.

Studies on the long-term kidney prognosis of hematuria have mostly focused on adults, and hematuria is a risk factor for ESKD and mortality in adults. In Japan, where urine test abnormalities are screened through national health screening, a study of more than 100,000 people in the general population reported that adult men with hematuria had a 1.4-fold increased risk of mortality and a 2.3-fold increased risk of ESKD [40,41]. While examining the association between hematuria and ESKD in adult patients with glomerulonephritis, mild to moderate hematuria (1–29 RBC/HPF) was a risk factor for ESKD in patients with IgAN, even after adjusting for other clinical and pathological factors [37], and hematuria was identified as a risk factor for mortality in advanced chronic kidney disease (stages 3–5) [42]. Therefore, this recommendation suggests annual height, weight, and blood pressure measurements, urine microscopy, and quantitative urine protein, including albumin, using urine samples taken immediately after waking up.

Conclusions

This guideline was developed to provide directions for all frontline healthcare providers and stakeholders for diagnosing and managing children with asymptomatic hematuria. The guidelines provide eight recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with asymptomatic hematuria. However, all recommendations have a low level of evidence for certainty. We identified the need for well-designed and rigorous randomized controlled trials of asymptomatic hematuria in children.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data are available at Kidney Research and Clinical Practice online (https://doi.org/10.23876/j-krcp-23-231).

j-krcp-23-231-Supplementary-Materials.pdf

Notes

Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Data sharing statement

The data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation: All authors

Supervision: HGK, JSS

Writing–original draft: EP

Writing–review & editing: EP

All authors read and approved to the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This guideline for asymptomatic hematuria in children was developed with the support of the Korean Society of Pediatric Nephrology.

References

1. Kliegman RM, St. Geme JW 3rd, Blum NJ, et al. Nelson textbook of pediatrics 21th edth ed. Elsevier; 2019.

2. Geary DF, Schaefer F. Pediatric kidney disease 2nd edth ed. Springer; 2016.

3. Vedula R, Iyengar AA. Approach to diagnosis and management of hematuria. Indian J Pediatr 2020;87:618–624.

4. Bignall ON 2nd, Dixon BP. Management of hematuria in children. Curr Treat Options Pediatr 2018;4:333–349.

5. Brown DD, Reidy KJ. Approach to the child with hematuria. Pediatr Clin North Am 2019;66:15–30.

6. Fulgham PF, Assimos DG, Pearle MS, Preminger GM. Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol 2013;189:1203–1213.

7. Riccabona M, Avni FE, Blickman JG, et al. Imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology: minutes of the ESPR uroradiology task force session on childhood obstructive uropathy, high-grade fetal hydronephrosis, childhood haematuria, and urolithiasis in childhood. ESPR Annual Congress, Edinburgh, UK, June 2008. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39:891–898.

8. Oner S, Oto A, Tekgul S, et al. Comparison of spiral CT and US in the evaluation of pediatric urolithiasis. JBR-BTR 2004;87:219–223.

9. Strohmaier WL. Diagnostic imaging in pediatric urolithiasis. J Pediatr Biochem 2014;4:81–88.

10. Johnson EK, Faerber GJ, Roberts WW, et al. Are stone protocol computed tomography scans mandatory for children with suspected urinary calculi? Urology 2011;78:662–666.

11. Puttmann K, Dajusta D, Rehfuss AW. Does twinkle artifact truly represent a kidney stone on renal ultrasound? J Pediatr Urol 2021;17:475.

12. Ananthan K, Onida S, Davies AH. Nutcracker syndrome: an update on current diagnostic criteria and management guidelines. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017;53:886–894.

13. Vianello FA, Mazzoni MB, Peeters GG, et al. Micro- and macroscopic hematuria caused by renal vein entrapment: systematic review of the literature. Pediatr Nephrol 2016;31:175–184.

14. Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging, Dillman JR, Rigsby CK, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hematuria-Child. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15:S91–S103.

15. Schwartz GJ, Schneider MF, Maier PS, et al. Improved equations estimating GFR in children with chronic kidney disease using an immunonephelometric determination of cystatin C. Kidney Int 2012;82:445–453.

16. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerular Diseases Work Group. KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of flomerular diseases. Kidney Int 2021;100:S1–S276.

17. Trachtman H, Weiss RA, Bennett B, Greifer I. Isolated hematuria in children: indications for a renal biopsy. Kidney Int 1984;25:94–99.

18. Lee YM, Baek SY, Kim JH, Kim DS, Lee JS, Kim PK. Analysis of renal biopsies performed in children with abnormal findings in urinary mass screening. Acta Paediatr 2006;95:849–853.

19. Túri S, Visy M, Vissy A, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with persistent/recurrent, isolated haematuria: a Hungarian multicentre study. Pediatr Nephrol 1989;3:235–239.

20. Lin CY, Hsieh CC, Chen WP, Yang LY, Wang HH. The underlying diseases and follow-up in Taiwanese children screened by urinalysis. Pediatr Nephrol 2001;16:232–237.

21. Cho BS, Hahn WH, Cheong HI, et al. A nationwide study of mass urine screening tests on Korean school children and implications for chronic kidney disease management. Clin Exp Nephrol 2013;17:205–210.

22. Güven S, Gökçe İ, Deniz NÇ, Altuntaş Ü, Yıldız N, Alpay H. Clinical and histopathological features of asymptomaticpersistent microscopic hematuria in children. Turk J Med Sci 2016;46:1707–1711.

23. Güngör T, Çakıcı EK, Yazılıtaş F, Karakaya D, Çelikkaya E, Bülbül M. Persistent asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in childhood: a single-centered experience: persistent asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. Ann Clin Anal Med 2021;12:S494–S497.

24. Zhai Y, Xu H, Shen Q, et al. Renal histological features of school-age children with asymptomatic haematuria and/or proteinuria: a multicenter study. Nephrology (Carlton) 2014;19:426–431.

25. Bergstein J, Leiser J, Andreoli S. The clinical significance of asymptomatic gross and microscopic hematuria in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:353–355.

26. Kashtan CE, Gross O. Clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Alport syndrome in children, adolescents, and young adults: an update for 2020. Pediatr Nephrol 2021;36:711–719.

27. Savige J, Lipska-Zietkiewicz BS, Watson E, et al. Guidelines for genetic testing and management of alport syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022;17:143–154.

28. Yuzawa Y, Yamamoto R, Takahashi K, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for IgA nephropathy 2014. Clin Exp Nephrol 2016;20:511–535.

29. Suzuki H, Kikuchi M, Koike K, et al. A digest from evidence-based clinical practice guideline for IgA nephropathy 2020. Clin Exp Nephrol 2021;25:1269–1276.

30. Park SJ, Shin JI. Comparative analysis of American Academy of Pediatrics and European Society of Hypertension guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric hypertension. Child Kidney Dis 2021;25:71–77.

31. Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol 2020;204:778–786.

32. Nonomura K, Kakizaki H. Recent trends of genitourinary endoscopy in children. Int J Urol 2005;12:607–614.

33. Greenfield SP, Williot P, Kaplan D. Gross hematuria in children: a ten-year review. Urology 2007;69:166–169.

34. Shelmerdine SC, Lorenzo AJ, Gupta AA, Chavhan GB. Pearls and pitfalls in diagnosing pediatric urinary bladder masses. Radiographics 2017;37:1872–1891.

35. Clark M, Aronoff S, Del Vecchio M. Etiologies of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in children: systematic review of 1092 subjects. Diagnosis (Berl) 2015;2:211–216.

36. Horie S, Ito S, Okada H, et al. Japanese guidelines of the management of hematuria 2013. Clin Exp Nephrol 2014;18:679–689.

37. Vivante A, Afek A, Frenkel-Nir Y, et al. Persistent asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria in Israeli adolescents and young adults and risk for end-stage renal disease. JAMA 2011;306:729–736.

38. Feng CY, Xia YH, Wang WJ, et al. Persistent asymptomatic isolated hematuria in children: clinical and histopathological features and prognosis. World J Pediatr 2013;9:163–168.

39. Kwak N, Park MJ, Jang HM, et al. Clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with normal renal histopathology. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2022;41:58–65.

40. Iseki K. The okinawa screening program. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003;14:S127–S130.

41. Goto M, Wakai K, Kawamura T, Ando M, Endoh M, Tomino Y. A scoring system to predict renal outcome in IgA nephropathy: a nationwide 10-year prospective cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:3068–3074.

42. You-Hsien Lin H, Yen CY, et al. Microscopic haematuria and clinical outcomes in patients with stage 3-5 nondiabetic chronic kidney disease. Sci Rep 2015;5:15242.

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial and No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution of the material without any modifications, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original works properly cited.

Topic	Recommendations	Strength of recommendation	Quality of evidence
1. Diagnostic tests	1-1. For asymptomatic gross hematuria, kidney and bladder ultrasonography is recommended.	Strong Recommendation: A	Low
1. Diagnostic tests	1-2. If asymptomatic microscopic hematuria of no known cause persists, kidney and bladder ultrasound may be considered.	Conditional recommendation: B	Low
2. Diagnostic tests	2-1. Kidney biopsy is not recommended for children with persistent asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria of unknown etiology in the absence of other medical or family histories, symptoms, or signs.	Conditional against: C	Low
2. Diagnostic tests	2-2. If persistent microscopic hematuria in children is accompanied by findings suggestive of chronic glomerular diseases such as proteinuria (albuminuria), hypertension, decreased kidney function, or nephropathy secondary to systemic disease, a kidney biopsy is recommended.	Strong Recommendation: A	Low
3. Diagnostic tests	3. Cystoscopy is not recommended for asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in children.	Expert consensus
4. Treatment	4-1. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers is not recommended for patients with asymptomatic isolated hematuria of unknown etiology.	Expert consensus
4. Treatment	4-2. Steroid treatment is not recommended for patients with asymptomatic isolated hematuria of unknown etiology.	Expert consensus
5. Follow-up	5. Children with asymptomatic isolated hematuria are recommended to be followed up regularly if the hematuria persists, even if the cause is unknown. Follow-up includes annual height, weight, blood pressure, urine microscopy, and urine protein quantification.	Conditional recommendation: B	Low