Korean Journal of Nephrology 1997;16(3):524-530.

헤파린 결합된 Hemophan 투석기를 사용한 혈액투석과 전신적 헤파린 투여한 혈액투석의 호율 비교

이규백 , 김윤구 , 이윤하 , 김대중 , 오하영 , 장세호

Abstract

Although hemodialysis using heparin bound Hemophan(HBH-HD) has been reported to be a possible modality that can be used in patients at high risk of bleeding, the efficiency of HBH-HD is not certain. To investigate the efficiency of HBH- HD, we compared the total blood compartment volume(TBCV), Kt/V and urea clearance of dialyzer(K) of HBH-HD with those of routine hemo- dialysis with systemic heparinization(R-HD) in the same patients. HBH-HD was switched to R-HD as soon as the bleeding risk had ceased. Before each HBH-HD, heparin solution(lliter, 20IU/ml saline) was recirculated through the Hemophan(Gambro dialyzer, GFS Plus 11) for 1 hour while removing saline solution(700ml/hr) by applying transmembrane pressure gradient, followed by a single pass rinse with 1 liter of saline solution. Then we performed 10 HBH-HD on 10 patients at risk of bleeding. The dilayzer had to be changed due to severe clotting in one patient during HBH-HD so the comparison of above parameters was possible in 9 patients. The duration of each dialysis was possible in 9 patients. The duration of each dialysis was standardized to 4 hours at blood flow of 200 to 250ml/min. During HBH-HD, there was a slight increase in activated partial thromboplastin time(aPTT)(45.02.6 sec) at 15 min after initiation of dialysis frorn predialysis level (35.81.3 sec), but no increase in aPTT was observed at 60min, 120min, and the end of dialyses. The loss of TBCV(%) of dialyzers was greater in HBH-HD (174%) than in R-HD(51%). The Kt/V and K of Although hemodialysis using heparin bound Hemophan(HBH-HD) has been reported to be a possible modality that can be used in patients at high risk of bleeding, the efficiency of HBH-HD is not certain. To investigate the efficiency of HBH- HD, we compared the total blood compartment volume(TBCV), Kt/V and urea clearance of dialyzer(K) of HBH-HD with those of routine hemo- dialysis with systemic heparinization(R-HD) in the same patients. HBH-HD was switched to R-HD as soon as the bleeding risk had ceased. Before each HBH-HD, heparin solution(lliter, 20IU/ml saline) was recirculated through the Hemophan(Gambro dialyzer, GFS Plus 11) for 1 hour while removing saline solution(700ml/hr) by applying transmembrane pressure gradient, followed by a single pass rinse with 1 liter of saline solution. Then we performed 10 HBH-HD on 10 patients at risk of bleeding. The dilayzer had to be changed due to severe clotting in one patient during HBH-HD so the comparison of above parameters was possible in 9 patients. The duration of each dialysis was possible in 9 patients. The duration of each dialysis was standardized to 4 hours at blood flow of 200 to 250ml/min. During HBH-HD, there was a slight increase in activated partial thromboplastin time(aPTT)(45.02.6 sec) at 15 min after initiation of dialysis frorn predialysis level (35.81.3 sec), but no increase in aPTT was observed at 60min, 120min, and the end of dialyses. The loss of TBCV(%) of dialyzers was greater in HBH-HD (174%) than in R-HD(51%). The Kt/V and K of HBH-HD, however, were 1.25±0.10 and 143±3ml/ min, respectively, which did not differ from those of R-HD which were 1.28±0.07 and 1.45+4ml/min, respectively. We conclude that the use of heparin bound Hemophan can be an efficient hemodialysis technique in patients at high risk of bleeding, but clotting of the dialyzer should be observed carefully during hemodialysis(values are mean± SE).