Kidney Res Clin Pract > Volume 41(5); 2022 > Article
Son, Ryu, Lee, Choi, Kim, Park, Shin, Kim, Ahn, Kim, Chin, Na, Chae, Ahn, Hwang, and Jeong: The importance of muscle mass in predicting intradialytic hypotension in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis

Abstract

Background

Patients undergoing hemodialysis are susceptible to sarcopenia. As intracellular reservoirs of water, skeletal muscles are important contributors to intradialytic hypotension. This study was designed to determine the role of skeletal muscle mass in intradialytic hypotension.

Methods

In a cross-sectional study, the body composition of 177 patients was measured immediately after hemodialysis using bioelectrical impedance analysis. The parameters measured were skeletal muscle mass, intracellular and extracellular water contents, total body water, and cell-membrane functionality (in phase angle at 50 kHz). Data from laboratory tests, chest radiography, measurements of handgrip strength and mid-arm circumference, and questionnaires were collected. The main outcome was intradialytic hypotension, defined as more than two episodes of hypotension (systolic blood pressure of <90 mmHg) with intervention over the 3 months following enrollment. Logistic regression models including each parameter related to sarcopenia were compared with a clinical model.

Results

Patients with a low ratio of skeletal muscle mass to dry body weight (SMM/WT) had a higher rate of intradialytic hypotension (40.7%). Most low-SMM/WT patients were female, obese, diabetic, and had a lower handgrip strength compared with the other patients. In the high-SMM/WT group, the risk of intradialytic hypotension was lower, with an odds ratio of 0.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02–0.28) and adjusted odds ratio of 0.06 (95% CI, 0.01–0.29).

Conclusion

Measurement and maintenance of skeletal muscle can help prevent intradialytic hypotension in frail patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Introduction

Patients undergoing hemodialysis who experience intradialytic hypotension (IDH) reportedly have higher risk of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and hospitalization [1,2]. A recent meta-analysis found that approximately 5% to 12% of patients undergoing hemodialysis experience IDH [3]. High ultrafiltration, decreased cardiac compensation, and autonomic dysfunction are possible pathophysiological mechanisms of IDH [4]. IDH occurs when the plasma volume removed during hemodialysis exceeds the refilling rate, which is determined largely by the interstitial volume. Due to the characteristics of patients undergoing hemodialysis, particularly with respect to age, nutritional status, and inflammation status [5], these patients tend to have less muscle mass and can show variable transcellular shifts. Therefore, each individual must decide the appropriate dry body weight to prevent IDH. Previous studies have suggested a relationship between body composition and IDH [6]; however, evidence is needed in terms of sarcopenia.
As people age, body composition changes as muscle mass decreases and adipose tissue increases. Sarcopenia begins with loss of muscle function, such as muscle strength, muscle power, or physical performance, which correlates well with prognosis [7,8]. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People recently defined sarcopenia as a combination of decreased muscle mass, low muscle strength, and poor physical performance. Sarcopenia correlates with obesity due to shared pathophysiological mechanisms, such as metabolic adaptations, stimulation of fat infiltration into muscle, and hormonal changes [9].
Among the various ways to measure skeletal muscle mass, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) has several strengths: it can measure several components of body composition, it is administered at the bedside, and it does not involve a radiocontrast technique [10,11]. Previous studies have shown that BIA can be used clinically to determine the required amount of ultrafiltration during hemodialysis to reach dry body weight, which leads to superior outcomes [12,13]. The aim of this study was to investigate the importance of skeletal muscle mass in IDH.

Methods

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Ajou University Hospital (No. AJIRB-MED-SUR-16-128) and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (No. B-2006/619-305). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants or a legal guardian, when applicable.

Study design

Body composition was measured by BIA immediately after hemodialysis on the day of regular blood examination in the month of enrollment. Skeletal muscle mass, intracellular and extracellular water contents, total body water, and cellular-membrane functionality (phase angle at 50 kHz) were measured. We then collected details regarding IDH events for the next 3 months.

Setting and participants

Patients who started maintenance hemodialysis at least 3 months before study onset were enrolled at three dialysis centers in 2016 and one center in 2020. In 2016, one center was a tertiary hospital, and the other two were local dialysis clinics, whereas in 2020, the dialysis center belonged to another tertiary hospital in South Korea.
Adults undergoing maintenance hemodialysis for more than 3 months who agreed to participate in this study and could understand and answer questionnaires were enrolled. To avoid potential risks associated with BIA measurement techniques, pregnant women, patients who had implanted electronic medical devices such as pacemakers or cardioverters, those with liver cirrhosis, and anyone receiving chemotherapy for solid cancer was excluded.
Among the 260 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, 72 were excluded due to refusal to sign an agreement, the inclusion/exclusion criteria, hospitalization during enrollment, or short duration of hemodialysis (≤3 months). Eleven patients dropped out after enrollment (Fig. 1). A total of 177 patients, including 143 patients in 2016 and 34 patients in 2020, was analyzed. They were ranked by ratio of skeletal muscle mass (measured by BIA) to dry body weight (SMM/WT) and divided into three groups (low-, middle-, and high-SMM/WT). Dry body weight was calculated by subtracting the amount of ultrafiltration from the pre-hemodialysis body weight.

Variables

The primary outcome was recurrent IDH, defined as more than two episodes of hypotension (systolic blood pres­sure [SBP] of <90 mmHg) requiring interventions such as reducing the amount of ultrafiltration; administration of mannitol, albumin, or saline loading; and discontinuation of the dialysis session [14]. Outcomes were verified against electronic medical records after each dialysis session. The data showed similar distributions for each parameter, and all parameters for participants were analyzed.

Measurements

Measurements were performed at baseline and at 3 months. At baseline, data on clinical characteristics, physical examinations including handgrip assessment, mid-arm maximal circumference, triceps skinfold thickness, medication data, Tilburg frailty questionnaires, Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) nutritional questionnaires, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) tests, chest radiographs, and BIA were collected. Medications for hypertension were transformed to an equivalent dose. At 3 months, medication data and any history of adverse events were recorded. The cardiac index was calculated as mediastinal width divided by chest width on chest radiography. A Jamar hand dynamometer (JAMAR@Hand Dynamometer; Patterson Medical, Ltd., Sutton-in-Ashfield, UK) was used by one researcher to assess patient grip strength in the absence of an arteriovenous fistula. Measurements were performed according to a unified protocol with the patient in a seated position, with shoulders adducted and neutrally rotated, and the wrist angle between 0° and 30°. A multifrequency bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy analyzer (Inbody S-10; Inbody, Seoul, Korea) was used to measure the reactance or impedance at five frequencies between 5 and 1,000 kHz. All BIA measurements were performed immediately after hemodialysis on the midweek day. Each BIA measurement used four electrodes, one on each limb. The duration of the measurements was approximately 1 to 2 minutes. During BIA assessment, patients were in a seated or supine position and remained still. Raw impedance data and calculated data on body composition of extracellular and intracellular water contents, total body water, and skeletal muscle mass were obtained. Using criteria set by the Asian Working Group [7], sarcopenia was defined as both low handgrip strength (HGS) and low skeletal muscle mass. Low skeletal muscle mass was defined as a ratio of appendicular skeletal muscle mass (measured by BIA) to squared height of ≤7.0 kg/m2 in males and ≤5.7 kg/m2 in females. The criterion for low HGS was ≤28 kg•f in males and ≤18 kg•f in females. Only patients with low HGS were classified as having possible sarcopenia [7].

Statistical methods

Baseline characteristics are expressed as mean ± standard deviation for continuous data and number (percentage) for categorical variables. To compare the characteristics of the two groups according to development of IDH, Student t-test was used for continuous variables, and the chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Analysis of variance was used to compare continuous variables among tertiles of SMM/WT. To account for the impact of potential confounders on IDH, we considered both adjustment and weighting methods. The adjustment method involved a multivariable logistic regression model with potential confounders of age, sex, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases including chronic heart failure and ischemic heart disease, cardiac index, and the percentage of the amount of ultrafiltration (kg) to body weight (kg) per session. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance confounders among the three SMM/WT groups. The IPTW analysis required a propensity score estimate, which was achieved by gradient-boosted logistic regression. In addition, we conducted a logistic regression analysis with comprehensive BIA parameters, including SMM/WT as a continuous variable, to enhance predictability. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated the predictive accuracy of the BIA parameters.
We assessed the odds of IDH at different SMM/WT and HGS values as both continuous and categorical variables indicative of sarcopenia. The multivariable logistic regression model for IDH was depicted as a cubic spline curve, with each curve having four equally distributed nodes at the 5th, 35th, 65th, and 95th percentiles for SMM/WT. To group patients using the newly defined cutoff values of SMM/WT and HGS, the values were defined as the points at which the odds of IDH began to increase. Patients grouped according to SMM/WT and HGS were included as new variables in the multivariable logistic regression model to assess the odds of IDH. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata software (version 16; StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) and R language (version 3.6.3, R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). The mnps function in the twang package with an interaction depth of 2 and 20,000 trees in R version 3.6.3 was used to estimate the propensity score.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Among the 177 patients, 39 experienced IDH (Table 1). The mean age of the enrolled patients was 59.5 ± 14.5 years. Half of all the study participants were females. The mean duration of hemodialysis before study enrollment was 5.5 ± 4.3 years. Patients experiencing IDH were more likely to be female, had a higher body mass index, and experienced shorter hemodialysis periods compared with those without IDH. Of all patients, 45.8% were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, 19.8% had ischemic heart disease, 8.5% had chronic heart failure, 10.7% had stroke, and 5.6% had peripheral arterial occlusive disease. The percentage of comorbidities of ischemic heart disease, chronic heart failure, stroke, or peripheral arterial occlusive disease was higher in the patients experiencing IDH than in those without IDH. The proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus was higher in IDH patients. The distribution of etiologies to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the two groups was different, but diabetes mellitus was the most common cause of ESRD in both groups. The SMM/WT ratio was 38.9% ± 5.8% in total, 40.2% ± 5.3% in the patients without IDH, and 34.3% ± 4.9% in the patients experiencing IDH. One patient refused to undergo HGS measurement. The mean value of HGS was lower in patients who developed IDH than in patients who did not. Of all patients, 113 (63.8%) were classified as having possible sarcopenia based on HGS. The ratio of possible sarcopenia (84.6%) was statistically higher in patients with IDH compared to those without IDH (58.0%). Combining these results with the ratio of skeletal muscle mass to squared height, four participants (2.3%) were classified as having sarcopenia. In patients experiencing IDH, triceps skin thickness and mid-arm maximal circumference were higher than in patients without IDH, but the difference was not statistically significant. The mean score of the PG-SGA was lower and the Tilburg frailty index was higher in patients experiencing IDH, but the difference was not statistically different. The mean cardiac index or NT-proBNP level did not differ between the two groups.

Main results

Comparison of the odds of intradialytic hypotension among the three skeletal muscle mass to dry body weight groups

Among the 177 patients, 59 were included in each tertile of SMM/WT. The characteristics of patients in the tertile SMM/WT groups are described in Supplementary Table 1 (available online). The mean values for SMM/WT in the low-, middle-, and high-SMM/WT groups were 32.6% ± 3.0%, 38.8% ± 1.8%, and 45.3% ± 2.6%, respectively. A total of 24 patients (40.7%) in the low, 12 (20.3%) in the middle, and 3 (5.1%) in the high-SMM/WT group experienced IDH. The incidence of IDH was higher in the low-SMM/WT group than in the middle- and high-SMM/WT groups.
The clinical variables used to predict IDH were age, sex, cardiovascular disease such as chronic heart failure or ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, cardiac index, and the amount of ultrafiltration per body weight before hemodialysis. Each variable was independent of the others. In the univariable logistic model, lower SMM/WT was associated with significantly higher odds of IDH (p < 0.001) (Table 2). When comparing the odds ratio of IDH among the three SMM/WT groups, that in the middle-SMM/WT group was 0.37 (p = 0.02) and that in the high-SMM/WT group was 0.08 (p < 0.001) compared with the low-SMM/WT group. We assessed the balance of the seven clinical and BIA variables used to generate IPTW. After IPTW, the odds ratio of IDH was 0.83 (p = 0.06) in the middle-SMM/WT group and 0.71 (p < 0.001) in the high-SMM/WT group compared with the low-SMM/WT group. The odds ratios of variables in the logistic regression model are described in Supplementary Table 2 (available online). The odds ratio of diabetes mellitus to the risk of IDH was 5.00 (p = 0.001), and that of the ultrafiltration amount by weight was 1.70 (p = 0.002).

Low skeletal muscle mass to dry body weight and low handgrip strength indicate higher odds of intradialytic hypotension

In Fig. 2A, in which the odds ratios of IDH according to SMM/WT are depicted by a restricted cubic spline curve, the log odds of IDH increased linearly as SMM/WT decreased, indicating an increased probability of IDH event according to the decrease in SMM/WT. Cubic spline curves are used to depict the relationship between HGS and the log odds of IDH in Fig. 2B. The odds of IDH in females increased when HGS was less than 19.0 kg•f and decreased when HGS was greater than 19.0 kg•f in males (Supplementary Fig. 1, available online).
Forty-four patients (24.9%) had both SMM/WT of <36.0% and HGS of <19.0 kg•f. Fifty-seven patients (32.2%) had either SMM/WT of <36.0% or HGS of <19.0 kg•f. Overall, 15 patients (8.5%) had SMM/WT of <36.0% and HGS of ≥19.0 kg•f, and 42 (23.7%) had SMM/WT of ≥36.0% and HGS of <19.0 kg•f. As with the cubic spline curves, patients with either SMM/WT of <36.0% or HGS of <19.0 kg•f were at higher risk of IDH by a factor of 4.44 compared with those with both SMM/WT of ≥36.0% and HGS of ≥19.0 kg•f (Table 3). The odds ratio of IDH was 17.11 when the patients had both SMM/WT of <36.0% and HGS of <19.0 kg•f compared with those with both SMM/WT of ≥36.0% and HGS of ≥19.0 kg•f. The odds ratio of IDH in patients with SMM/WT of <36.0% and HGS of ≥19.0 kg•f was 6.83 (p = 0.02) (Supplementary Table 3, available online). In patients with HGS of <19.0 kg•f and SMM/WT of ≥36.0%, the odds ratio was 3.55, although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.07).
We then compared the area under the ROC curve (AUC) to predict IDH in the clinical model (model 8) and clinical-plus-BIA models (Table 4). Model 1, which included HGS and SMM/WT, produced a statistically higher AUC compared with the model that included only clinical parameters (model 8) (AUC of model 1 = 0.877, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82–0.93; AUC of model 8 = 0.809, 95% CI, 0.74–0.88; p = 0.008). Model 2, including SMM/WT, also showed a relatively higher AUC (0.843, 95% CI, 0.78–0.91; p of AUC of model 2 compared to model 8 = 0.01). Model 1 explained IDH better than model 8 in some subgroups, such as female patients, patients aged ≥65 years, those with diabetes mellitus, and patients with greater ultrafiltration per weight (Supplementary Table 4, available online).

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the relationship between development of IDH and measurement of skeletal muscle mass using BIA. A lower percentage of skeletal muscle mass to body weight was associated with a higher rate of IDH. Furthermore, characteristics of sarcopenia such as low skeletal muscle mass and low muscle power were related to IDH, a frequent complication during maintenance hemodialysis.
The volume and movement of body water constitute one of the pathophysiological mechanisms of IDH. It has been suggested that the water content in approximately 10% to 20% of skeletal muscle mass is dynamically mobile [15]. We propose that skeletal muscle mass, as a reservoir of water, can be an important predictor of IDH. A previous study measured relaxation times in patients undergoing hemodialysis by nanoscale magnetic resonance, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and BIA [16]. The authors suggested that the amount of water in the muscle, the lower legs in particular, was higher in volume-overloaded patients but decreased after hemodialysis to levels similar to those in the healthy population. In the clinical field, doctors assume that body weight determines the rate of ultrafiltration, which might be higher than the refilling rate. One previous study showed that transcellular shift of body water from extracellular to intracellular fluid by osmotic alteration was higher in patients who experienced IDH compared with the expected amount of ultrafiltration in stable patients [17]. The authors reported that body weights in the two groups were similar, although hydration states differed. This suggests that body composition is more important than body weight in preventing IDH. In the present study, we showed that measurement of the percentage of skeletal muscle mass to body weight could be an applicable indicator of dry body weight. Extracellular water to total body water was also a significant predictor of IDH. However, a previous study showed that over-hydration derived from extracellular fluid measured by BIA was a false-positive factor in malnourished patients [18]. We investigated the role of the IDH predictor not only in extracellular water but also in skeletal muscle mass.
The patients enrolled in this study were mostly elderly and had a lower skeletal muscle mass relative to body weight. According to data from the 2013 ESRD Registry Committee of the Korea Society of Nephrology, the proportion of elderly patients undergoing dialysis in Korea was 39.5% compared to 12.2% in the general population [19]. A 16-year-follow-up epidemiologic study using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database showed that the mean age of patients undergoing hemodialysis increased between 2002 and 2017 [20]. Due to old age, chronic inflammation, and frailty in most patients undergoing maintenance dialysis, sarcopenia (decreased muscle mass) should be considered by nephrologists [21,22]. Although the ratio of patients diagnosed with sarcopenia according to the criteria by the Asian Working Group was low, possible sarcopenia accounted for more than 64% of this cohort. Patients who fulfilled the criteria for possible sarcopenia showed low HGS, and this also explained the risk of IDH after multivariable logistic analysis and comparison of AUCs. In addition to a quantitative approach to skeletal muscle, our study also found that higher HGS was associated with lower odds of IDH. Considering that previous studies emphasized muscle strength as a criterion for diagnosing sarcopenia [23], these results support the importance of the quality of muscles. Patients in the low-SMM/WT group had a higher body mass index and a higher skinfold thickness relative to mid-arm maximal circumference, indicating higher rates of adipose tissue mass and obesity. These are characteristics of sarcopenic obesity [8], which represents a potential public health problem due to clinical consequences. Obesity and sarcopenia are known to have a synergistic and negative impact on performance status among the elderly [24]. Several studies have revealed that low lean tissue index (kg/m2), skeletal muscle mass (kg) per square height (m2), and high-fat tissue index (kg/m2) are risk factors for IDH or mortality [6,2527]. In that regard, the poor prognosis found in this and previous studies suggest that a higher fat tissue index with a low lean tissue index should be interpreted as poor quality of muscle.
Measurements of body composition have been conducted to find more convenient methods using tools such as MRI, computed tomography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and BIA [28,29]. Using the dephasing time between the solid and liquid phases, nanoscale nuclear molecular resonance spectrometry has been suggested to qualitatively measure body composition [30]. Due to the convenience and safety of a bedside non-radiocontrast method that correlates closely with conventional methods [31], we used BIA to measure skeletal muscle mass immediately after hemodialysis, when the body weight would be close to “dry body weight,” excluding excessive interstitial body water. In a previous cross-sectional study [32], the phase angle at 50 kHz was positively correlated with the ratio of lean tissue mass to dry body weight, which was similar to the results of our study. As it is derived from the phase angle, extracellular water is related to IDH. The accuracy and utility of extracellular water using BIA are problematic in hemodialysis patients [33,34]. Nevertheless, by measuring different parameters in hemodialysis patients, BIA correlated closely with other characteristics [35]. As the ultrafiltration rate is indicative of IDH [36,37], we adjusted the ultrafiltration rate. Skeletal muscle mass was still an important indicator.
There are some limitations to this study. First, although the Tilburg frailty parameter and subjective global assessment to evaluate sarcopenia [38] did not capture prognostic significance, we suspect that this can be attributed to the limited sensitivity of the clinical questionnaire rather than noninvolvement of any frailty mechanism. We also measured other parameters of sarcopenia, such as a simple handgrip assessment, which functioned as a good predictor of IDH. Second, we defined IDH using an absolute criterion of SBP < 90 mmHg and need for intervention. This might have increased the heterogeneity of the definition of IDH in previous studies, which defined IDH in numerous ways; for example, the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality initiative defined IDH as a decrease in SBP of ≥20 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure of ≥10 mmHg [39]. We suggest that combining clinical intervention with the definition of IDH could lessen the effect of clinically insignificant changes in blood pressure on the results of our study. Third, as there was a deviation in the results due to the small number of samples and the limited ability to detect minimal differences among samples, further investigation is warranted. We attempted to reduce outcome bias by statistical weighting. Finally, the appropriate measurement time of BIA to accurately measure skeletal muscle mass is uncertain. Previous studies of changes in skeletal muscle mass pre- and post-hemodialysis [40,41] have produced conflicting findings. We expect that further studies will be needed to determine the optimal method of applying skeletal muscle mass in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
In conclusion, low skeletal muscle mass as a fraction of body mass is associated with IDH. For elderly patients with sarcopenia undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, prevention of IDH would be more successful using measurements of body composition by BIA. The application of skeletal muscle mass to prevent IDH in patients undergoing hemodialysis should be investigated in future studies.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

This research was supported by the grant from the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Research Fund (No. 02-2020-026).

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition: JCJ

Data curation: HES, JYR, KL, YIC, MSK, JCJ

Methodology: HES, SA, SSH

Project administration: HK, JCJ, CA

Supervision: IP, GTS, HK, SK, HJC, KYN, DWC

Resources, Software: SK

Writing–original draft: HES, JCJ, SSH

Writing–review & editing: JYR, KL, YIC, MSK, IP, GTS, HK, CA, SK, HJC, KYN, DWC, SA

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Division of Statistics in the Medical Research Collaborating Center at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital for the statistical analysis. Ms. Beom Ju Kim and Ms. Hyun Joo Shin helped this study for data acquisition.

Figure 1.

Study enrollment.

j-krcp-21-153f1.jpg
Figure 2.

Restricted cubic spline curve of odds according to change of the percentage of SMM to WT (A) and the change of HGS (B).

The perpendicular dotted lines in (A) indicate the upper limit of the ratio of SMM (kg) to WT (kg) (SMM/WT) of the low- and middle-SMM/WT tertiles. The log of odds of intradialytic hypotension increased linearly when the SMM/WT was less than 36.0%. In (B), the dotted line indicates the median value of HGS (kg•f).
HGS, handgrip strength; SMM, skeletal muscle mass; WT, dry body weight.
j-krcp-21-153f2.jpg
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics
Characteristic Total (n = 177) Intradialytic hypotension
p-value
Yes (n = 39) No (n = 138)
Age (yr) 59.5 ± 14.5 62.1 ± 11.2 58.8 ± 15.3 0.22
Male sex 87 (49.2) 13 (33.3) 74 (53.6) 0.03
Weight (kg) 59.3 ± 11.0 60.2 ± 12.0 59.1 ± 10.8 0.58
Height (cm) 161.8 ± 8.6 159.8 ± 8.6 162.4 ± 8.5 <0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2) 22.5 ± 3.3 23.5 ± 4.2 22.2 ± 2.9 0.03
Duration of hemodialysis (yr) 5.5 ± 4.3 5.1 ± 3.1 5.6 ± 4.6 0.50
Etiology of ESRD <0.001
 Diabetes mellitus 66 (37.3) 27 (69.2) 39 (28.3)
 Hypertension 28 (15.8) 2 (5.1) 26 (18.8)
 Glomerulonephritis 35 (19.8) 3 (7.7) 32 (23.2)
 Others 24 (13.6) 2 (5.1) 22 (15.9)
 Unknown 24 (13.6) 5 (12.8) 19 (13.8)
Hypertension 150 (84.7) 35 (89.7) 115 (83.3) 0.33
Diabetes mellitus 81 (45.8) 30 (76.9) 51 (37.0) <0.001
Ischemic heart disease 35 (19.8) 14 (35.9) 21 (15.2) 0.004
Chronic heart failure 15 (8.5) 7 (17.9) 8 (5.8) 0.02
Stroke 19 (10.7) 8 (20.5) 11 (8.0) 0.03
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease 10 (5.6) 6 (15.4) 4 (2.9) 0.003
NT-proBNP (pg/mL) 9,359.3 ± 9,705.2 10,249.2 ± 10,136.7 9,107.9 ± 9,602.9 0.52
Cardiac index (%) 51.7 ± 6.9 51.9 ± 5.0 51.7 ± 7.4 0.85
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 10.4 ± 0.9 10.6 ± 1.0 10.3 ± 0.9 0.20
Blood urine nitrogen (mg/dL) 61.0 ± 15.8 63.1 ± 15.9 60.4 ± 15.7 0.33
Creatinine (mg/dL) 9.9 ± 3.0 8.8 ± 2.6 10.2 ± 3.1 0.01
Calcium (mg/dL) 9.0 ± 0.6 8.9 ± 0.6 9.0±0.7 0.53
Sodium (mEq/L) 137.5 ± 3.3 136.8 ± 3.3 137.7 ± 3.2 0.15
Phosphate (mg/dL) 5.2 ± 1.5 5.4 ± 1.6 5.1 ± 1.4 0.33
Albumin (g/dL) 3.9 ± 0.4 3.9 ± 0.4 3.9 ± 0.4 0.86
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 148.4 ± 33.7 150.6 ± 39.8 147.7 ± 31.9 0.64
Low-density lipoprotein (mg/dL) 86.4 ± 72.6 109.4 ± 136.8 78.4 ± 25.1 0.08
Iron (ng/mL) 65.8 ± 31.0 57.5 ± 30.4 68.1 ± 30.9 0.06
TIBC (μg/dL) 229.3 ± 46.9 233.6 ± 55.3 228.1.6 ± 44.3 0.52
Ferritin (ng/mL) 245.3 ± 395.3 248.0 ± 198.1 244.5 ± 435.8 0.96
Potassium (mEq/L) 5.4 ± 1.0 5.7 ± 1.1 5.3 ± 1.0 0.03
Parathyroid hormone (pg/mL) 254.5 ± 206.0 199.2 ± 157.4 270.1 ± 215.7 0.06
Ultrafiltration per weight (%) 4.5 ± 1.7 5.1 ± 1.9 4.4 ± 1.6 0.02
spKt/V 1.6 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.3 0.34
PG-SGA score 3.7 ± 4.4 3.3 ± 3.9 3.8 ± 4.5 0.56
Tilburg frailty score (score) 3.5 ± 2.5 4.1 ± 2.5 3.3 ± 2.5 0.09
Triceps skinfold thickness (mm) 17.8 ± 7.9 18.7 ± 8.1 17.6 ± 7.8 0.43
Mid-arm muscle circumference (cm) 26.3 ± 3.2 26.6 ± 3.8 26.2 ± 3.1 0.53
Handgrip strength (kg·f) 21.1 ± 10.3 16.5 ± 7.9 22.4 ± 10.6 0.001
Percentage of SMM to WT (%) 38.9 ± 5.8 34.3 ± 4.9 40.2 ± 5.3 <0.001
SMM to squared height (kg/m2) 8.7 ± 1.2 8.9 ± 1.2 7.9 ± 1.0 <0.001
Possible sarcopeniaa 113 (63.8) 33 (84.6) 80 (58.0) 0.003
Sarcopeniab 4 (2.3) 3 (7.7) 1 (0.7) 0.01
Extracellular water to TBW (%) 39.4 ± 1.5 40.1 ± 1.3 39.2 ± 1.5 0.001
Intracellular water to TBW (%) 60.6 ± 1.5 59.8 ± 1.3 60.8 ± 1.5 <0.001
Phase angle at 50 Hz (˚) 4.9 ± 1.2 4.4 ± 0.9 5.0 ± 1.2 0.002
Medication prescription
 Antihypertensive 132 (74.6) 24 (61.5) 108 (78.3) 0.03
 No. of medicationsc 0.23
  1–2 91 (51.4) 19 (48.7) 72 (52.2)
  ≥3 41 (23.2) 5 (12.8) 36 (26.1)
 Beta blocker 110 (62.1) 21 (53.8) 89 (64.5) 0.23
 ACE inhibitor 37 (20.9) 6 (15.4) 31 (22.5) 0.34
 ARB 105 (59.3) 16 (41.0) 89 (64.5) 0.008
 Diuretics 37 (20.9) 5 (12.8) 32 (23.2) 0.16
 Calcium-channel blocker 35 (19.8) 5 (12.8) 30 (21.7) 0.22
 Alpha-blocker 42 (23.7) 5 (12.8) 37 (26.8) 0.07
 Vasodilator 37 (20.9) 6 (15.4) 31 (22.5) 0.34
 Total prescribed medicationsd 2.4 ± 2.7 1.7 ± 2.2 2.6 ± 2.8 0.09

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, number (%), or number only.

Cutoff values to classify sarcopenia followed the criteria of the Asian Working Group.

ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; NT-proBNP, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; SMM, skeletal muscle mass; spKt/V, single-pool ratio of urea clearance multiplied by dialysis time to volume; PG-SGA, patient-generated subjective global assessment; TBW, total body water; TIBC, total iron binding capacity; WT, dry body weight.

a Possible sarcopenia was defined as low handgrip strength (<28 kg•f in males and <18 kg•f in females).

b Sarcopenia was defined as both low handgrip strength (<28 kg•f in males and <18 kg•f in females) and low ratio of SMM to squared height (<7.0 kg/m2 in males and <5.7 kg/m2 in females).

c Number of medications refers to the individual medications prescribed.

d The total prescribed medications are the total equivalent dosages.

Table 2.
Comparison of the OR of IDH over 3 months by percentage of SMM (kg) to WT (kg)
Variable OR (95% CI) of IDH among groups divided by SMM/WT
Low (reference) Middle High
Unadjusted Reference 0.37 (0.16–0.85)a 0.08 (0.02–0.28)b
Multivariable regressionc Reference 0.30 (0.10–0.88)a 0.06 (0.01–0.29)b
IPTWc Reference 0.83 (0.69–1.00) 0.71 (0.59–0.85)b

Patients were grouped by rank numbering in order of the percentage of SMM (kg), measured by bioimpedance analysis, to WT (kg), as tertile groups of low, middle, and high percentage of SMM to WT. OR to IDH were analyzed using logistic models before and after weighting.

CI, confidence interval; IDH, intradialytic hypotension; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; OR, odds ratio; SMM, skeletal muscle mass; SMM/WT, percentage of SMM to WT; WT, dry body weight.

a p > 0.001, p < 0.05.

b p < 0.001.

c Adjusted for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular comorbidities (chronic heart failure or ischemic heart disease), cardiac index, and ratio of the amount of ultrafiltration to body weight.

Table 3.
Multivariable analysis of factors, including SMM/WT and HGS, associated with IDH
Variable OR (95% CI)
SMM/WT (%) plus HGS (kg·f) (vs. SMM/WT, ≥36.0 and HGS, ≥19.0)
 Either SMM/WT, <36.0 or HGS, <19.0 4.44 (1.29–15.33)
 SMM/WT, <36.0 and HGS, <19.0 17.11 (3.47–84.27)
Age 1.00 (0.96–1.04)
Male sex (vs. female) 1.47 (0.45–4.80)
DM (vs. non-DM) 5.68 (2.20–14.65)
Cardiovascular comorbiditiesa (yes vs. no) 2.26 (0.90–5.69)
Cardiac index 0.95 (0.88–1.03)
Ultrafiltration per weight 1.60 (1.18–2.16)

To classify SMM/WT and HGS, we used the highest value in the low-SMM/WT tertile group (36.0%), and the median value of HGS (19.0 kg•f) showed an OR of 17.11 to IDH compared to that in patients with SMM/WT of ≥36.0% and HGS of ≥19.0 kg•f.

CI, confidence interval; DM, diabetes mellitus; HGS, handgrip strength; IDH, intradialytic hypotension; OR, odds ratio; SMM, skeletal muscle mass; SMM/WT, percentage of SMM to WT; WT, dry body weight.

a Cardiovascular comorbidities were chronic heart failure or ischemic heart disease.

Table 4.
ROC curves of multivariable logistic models including clinical parameters plus each parametera
Model including ROC area (95% CI)
Clinical parameters + SMM/WT + HGS 0.88 (0.83–0.94)b
Clinical parameters + SMM/WT 0.88 (0.83–0.93)b
Clinical parameters + SMM to squared height 0.85 (0.78–0.91)
Clinical parameters + ECW to TBW 0.81 (0.74–0.88)
Clinical parameters + ICW to TBW 0.81 (0.74–0.89)
Clinical parameters + PA 0.81 (0.74–0.89)
Clinical parameters + HGS 0.81 (0.74–0.88)
Clinical parameters only 0.81 (0.74–0.88)

Parameters measured by bioimpedance analysis were included as continuous variables in each multivariable logistic model. Clinical parameters were age, sex, cardiovascular comorbidities (chronic heart failure or ischemic heart disease), diabetes mellitus, cardiac index, and percentage of ultrafiltration to body weight. The AUC was statistically higher in models including the percentage of SMM (kg) to WT (kg) compared with those of other models.

AUC, area under the ROC curve; CI, confidence interval; ECW, extracellular water; HGS, handgrip strength; ICW, intracellular water; PA, phase angle; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; SMM, skeletal muscle mass; SMM/WT, percentage of SMM to WT; TBW, total body water; WT, dry body weight.

a Such as the percentage of SMM(kg) to WT (kg) (SMM/WT) plus HGS (kg•f) (model 1), SMM/WT (%) (model 2), SMM to height2 (kg/m2) (model 3), ECW to TBW (kg/kg) (model 4), ICW to TBW (kg/kg) (model 5), PA at 50 kHz (model 6), or HGS (kg•f) (model 7) and only clinical parameters (model 8).

b ROC area of the model was higher than that of the other models (p < 0.05).

References

1. Dasgupta I, Thomas GN, Clarke J, et al. Associations between hemodialysis facility practices to manage fluid volume and intradialytic hypotension and patient outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019;14:385–393.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Stefánsson BV, Brunelli SM, Cabrera C, et al. Intradialytic hypotension and risk of cardiovascular disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;9:2124–2132.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Kuipers J, Verboom LM, Ipema KJR, et al. The prevalence of intradialytic hypotension in patients on conventional hemodialysis: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Nephrol 2019;49:497–506.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
4. Agarwal R. How can we prevent intradialytic hypotension? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2012;21:593–599.
crossref pmid
5. Meuwese CL, Carrero JJ, Stenvinkel P. Recent insights in inflammation-associated wasting in patients with chronic kidney disease. Contrib Nephrol 2011;171:120–126.
crossref pmid
6. Tian M, Zha Y, Qie S, Lin X, Yuan J. Association of body composition and intradialytic hypotension in hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif 2020;49:334–340.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020;21:300–307.e2.
crossref pmid
8. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010;39:412–423.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Batsis JA, Villareal DT. Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018;14:513–537.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
10. Bartels EM, Sørensen ER, Harrison AP. Multi-frequency bioimpedance in human muscle assessment. Physiol Rep 2015;3:e12354.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Buendía R, Gil-Pita R, Seoane F. Cole parameter estimation from total right side electrical bioimpedance spectroscopy measurements: influence of the number of frequencies and the upper limit. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011;2011:1843–1846.
crossref pmid
12. Onofriescu M, Hogas S, Voroneanu L, et al. Bioimpedance-guided fluid management in maintenance hemodialysis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;64:111–118.
crossref pmid
13. Onofriescu M, Siriopol D, Voroneanu L, et al. Overhydration, cardiac function and survival in hemodialysis patients. PLoS One 2015;10:e0135691.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Flythe JE, Xue H, Lynch KE, Curhan GC, Brunelli SM. Association of mortality risk with various definitions of intradialytic hypotension. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;26:724–734.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Belton PS, Packer KJ. Pulsed NMR studies of water in striated muscle. 3. The effects of water content. Biochim Biophys Acta 1974;354:305–314.
crossref pmid
16. Colucci LA, Corapi KM, Li M, et al. Fluid assessment in dialysis patients by point-of-care magnetic relaxometry. Sci Transl Med 2019;11:eaau1749.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Ismail AH, Gross T, Schlieper G, et al. Monitoring transcellular fluid shifts during episodes of intradialytic hypotension using bioimpedance spectroscopy. Clin Kidney J 2019;14:149–155.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
18. Keane DF, Bowra K, Kearney K, Lindley E. Use of the body composition monitor for fluid status measurements in elderly malnourished subjects. ASAIO J 2017;63:507–511.
crossref pmid
19. Jin DC. Major changes and improvements of dialysis therapy in Korea: review of end-stage renal disease registry. Korean J Intern Med 2015;30:17–22.
crossref pmid pmc
20. Choi HS, Han KD, Oh TR, et al. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of end-stage renal disease with hemodialysis in entire Korean population: a nationwide population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021;100:e25293.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Gamboa JL, Roshanravan B, Towse T, et al. Skeletal muscle mitochondrial dysfunction is present in patients with CKD before initiation of maintenance hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020;15:926–936.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Johansen KL, Dalrymple LS, Delgado C, et al. Association between body composition and frailty among prevalent hemodialysis patients: a US Renal Data System special study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;25:381–389.
crossref pmid pmc
23. Chang CI, Huang KC, Chan DC, et al. The impacts of sarcopenia and obesity on physical performance in the elderly. Obes Res Clin Pract 2015;9:256–265.
crossref pmid
24. Roh E, Choi KM. Health consequences of sarcopenic obesity: a narrative review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020;11:332.
crossref pmid pmc
25. Yajima T, Arao M, Yajima K, Takahashi H, Yasuda K. The associations of fat tissue and muscle mass indices with all-cause mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. PLoS One 2019;14:e0211988.
crossref pmid pmc
26. Caetano C, Valente A, Oliveira T, Garagarza C. Body composition and mortality predictors in hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr 2016;26:81–86.
crossref pmid
27. Marcelli D, Usvyat LA, Kotanko P, et al. Body composition and survival in dialysis patients: results from an international cohort study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;10:1192–1200.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Heymsfield SB, Adamek M, Gonzalez MC, Jia G, Thomas DM. Assessing skeletal muscle mass: historical overview and state of the art. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2014;5:9–18.
crossref pmid pmc
29. Malavolti M, Mussi C, Poli M, et al. Cross-calibration of eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of total and appendicular body composition in healthy subjects aged 21-82 years. Ann Hum Biol 2003;30:380–391.
crossref pmid
30. Aslam N, Pfender M, Neumann P, et al. Nanoscale nuclear magnetic resonance with chemical resolution. Science 2017;357:67–71.
crossref pmid
31. Kaysen GA, Zhu F, Sarkar S, et al. Estimation of total-body and limb muscle mass in hemodialysis patients by using multifrequency bioimpedance spectroscopy. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:988–995.
crossref pmid
32. Yashiro M, Kotera H. Association of bioimpedance-derived 50-kHz phase angle as marker of body composition with electrical parameters regarding the Cole-Cole model. Ther Apher Dial 2021;25:166–178.
crossref pmid pdf
33. Chanchairujira T, Mehta RL. Assessing fluid change in hemodialysis: whole body versus sum of segmental bioimpedance spectroscopy. Kidney Int 2001;60:2337–2342.
crossref pmid
34. Prakash S, Reddan D, Heidenheim AP, Kianfar C, Lindsay RM. Central, peripheral, and other blood volume changes during hemodialysis. ASAIO J 2002;48:379–382.
crossref pmid
35. Bellafronte NT, Sizoto GR, Vega-Piris L, Chiarello PG, Cuadrado GB. Bed-side measures for diagnosis of low muscle mass, sarcopenia, obesity, and sarcopenic obesity in patients with chronic kidney disease under non-dialysis-dependent, dialysis dependent and kidney transplant therapy. PLoS One 2020;15:e0242671.
crossref pmid pmc
36. Flythe JE, Chang TI, Gallagher MP, et al. Blood pressure and volume management in dialysis: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int 2020;97:861–876.
crossref pmid pmc
37. Leypoldt JK, Cheung AK, Delmez JA, et al. Relationship between volume status and blood pressure during chronic hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2002;61:266–275.
crossref pmid
38. Kim JK, Choi SR, Choi MJ, et al. Prevalence of and factors associated with sarcopenia in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease. Clin Nutr 2014;33:64–68.
crossref pmid
39. Assimon MM, Flythe JE. Definitions of intradialytic hypotension. Semin Dial 2017;30:464–472.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
40. Mamat R, Kong NC, Ba’in A, et al. Assessment of body fluid status in hemodialysis patients using the body composition monitor measurement technique. J Clin Nurs 2012;21:2879–2885.
crossref pmid
41. Keane DF, Baxter P, Lindley E, et al. The Body Composition Monitor: a flexible tool for routine fluid management across the haemodialysis population. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2017;3:035017.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
  • 7 Scopus
  • 2,891 View
  • 118 Download
ORCID iDs

Hyung Eun Son
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8719-3823

Ji Young Ryu
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4134-1007

Kyunghoon Lee
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3154-0347

Young Il Choi
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1150-9553

Myeong Sung Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9870-9605

Inwhee Park
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-5393

Gyu Tae Shin
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1343-5332

Heungsoo Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9380-7457

Curie Ahn
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7033-1102

Sejoong Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7238-9962

Ho Jun Chin
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3710-0190

Ki Young Na
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8872-8236

Dong-Wan Chae
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9401-892X

Soyeon Ahn
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3440-2027

Seung Sik Hwang
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1558-7831

Jong Cheol Jeong
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0301-7644

Related articles

Intradialytic hypotension and worse outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury requiring intermittent hemodialysis

Effect of Phoxilium on prognostic predictors in patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration2021 September;40(3)

Effect of volume indices of bioimpedance analysis on clinical outcomes, including left ventricular hypertrophy, in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis2021 March;40(1)

A Case of Chylothorax Associated with Idiopathic Stenosis of Left Subclavian Vein in a Patient Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis2009 April;28(2)

Recurrent Diabetic Muscle Infarction in A Patient on Maintenance Hemodialysis2007 July;26(4)



ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#301, (Miseung Bldg.) 23, Apgujenog-ro 30-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06022, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3486-8736    Fax: +82-2-3486-8737    E-mail: registry@ksn.or.kr                

Copyright © 2024 by The Korean Society of Nephrology.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer