Kidney Res Clin Pract > Volume 42(6); 2023 > Article
Kim, Park, and Yang: An intradialytic aerobic exercise program ameliorates frailty and improves dialysis adequacy and quality of life among hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial
Hemodialysis patients with chronic kidney disease commonly exhibit physical deconditioning in line with protein-energy wasting and frailty [1]. Enhancing physical activity improves body composition and preserves muscle mass in hemodialysis patients [2]. Intradialytic exercise modulates the metabolic balance by stimulating anabolic activity in muscle tissues with anabolic nutritional support in patients undergoing dialysis [3]. In contrast to previous literature, this study did not detect any beneficial effects on body composition parameters, including skeletal muscle mass, lower leg muscle mass, and body fat mass, after 40 to 70 minutes of ergometer cycling during each hemodialysis session, three times a week for 12 weeks, despite improvements in frailty, dialysis adequacy, and quality of life (QoL) [4]. These results suggest that the authors did not consider the effect of nutritional factors on body composition profiles [1,4].
Nutritional support or exercise training is associated with an increase in serum albumin and pre-albumin [1]. The serum albumin concentration is a crucial dialysis-related nutritional factor that reflects protein-energy wasting, muscle strength, and physical function in connection with intradialytic exercise training [2,4,5]. However, there is insufficient evidence of intradialytic aerobic exercise combined with nutritional factors to improve body composition parameters [5]. Therefore, this study hypothesized that an intradialytic aerobic exercise program combined with the nutritional factor of the serum albumin concentration affects frailty, dialysis adequacy, body composition parameters, and QoL among hemodialysis patients. The exercise group completed a 12-week program of intradialytic aerobic exercise and a single education session (n = 18), whereas the control group completed only the education session (n = 21). The serum albumin value was classified as low level (≤3.8 g/dL), or normal level (>3.8 g/dL) based on previous reports that low serum albumin (cutoff value of 3.8 g/dL) reflects protein-energy wasting that is concomitant with low body mass index, reduced muscle mass, and unintentional low dietary intake [6]. Moreover, it is evident that serum albumin higher than 3.8 g/dL is associated with a greater increase in renal urea clearance, normalized protein catabolic rate, lower mortality, and reduced cardiovascular death among hemodialysis patients [7,8]. In this study, the mean albumin value was 3.82 ± 0.38 g/dL. Cases of low albumin levels in the exercise and control groups were 50.0% (n = 9) and 57.1% (n = 12), respectively (χ2 = 0.20, p = 0.75). Although there was no significant difference in the baseline mean albumin value between the exercise and control groups (3.87 ± 0.18 g/dL vs. 3.77 ± 0.49 g/dL, t = 0.92, p = 0.37), the frailty score classified exercise and albumin level had a significant difference (p = 0.02) (Table 1). As we did not achieve selection balance, the dialysis vintage [4] and baseline frailty score should be considered confounding variables to determine the interaction effects. There was a significant interaction between groups and albumin levels in dialysis efficacy at week 12 (p = 0.02). The exercise group with albumin >3.8 g/dL exhibited the highest Kt/V of 1.88 ± 0.32 with a large effect size (f = 0.41) among the four subgroups (Table 1). The two-way analysis of covariance for changes in frailty, Kt/V, short physical performance battery score, body composition profiles, and QoL revealed that the exercise group with albumin>3.8 g/dL exhibited a significant improvement in the short physical performance battery score of 1.67 (p = 0.05) with a moderately high effect (f = 0.35) (Table 2). The change in lower leg muscle mass in the albumin >3.8 g/dL group was significantly lower than that in the albumin ≤3.8 g/dL group (p = 0.02) (Table 2).
This study did not find any significant interaction between exercise training and serum albumin levels with regard to an improvement in body composition profiles. Additional research is needed to determine whether aerobic exercise with various sessions, durations, and intensities, or nutritional support might be useful for improving body composition profiles in hemodialysis patients. The present study had several limitations that warrant consideration. First, we included only patients undergoing treatment at a single hemodialysis center, and the results might not be generalizable to other centers and patient populations [4]. Second, the small sample size could indicate a risk of bias to use of factorial statistics for the exercise and nutritional factors. Lastly, because the effects of intradialytic aerobic exercise on body composition have been controversial, this discrepancy should be verified through further research by modifying the duration, time, and intensity of the intradialytic aerobic exercise program and nutritional support program in a larger, multicenter population.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

None.

Data sharing statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology: all authors

Formal analysis: SK, HJP

Writing–original draft: all authors

Writing–review & editing: all authors

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Table 1.
Effect of frailty, dialysis adequacy, body composition parameters, and QoL according to intradialytic aerobic exercise and serum albumin levels
Parameter Albumin ≤ 3.8 g/dL (n = 21)
Albumin > 3.8 g/dL (n = 18)
Two-way ANCOVA
Exercise group (n = 9) Control group (n = 12) Exercise group (n = 9) Control group (n = 9)   F p η₂ (f)
Frailty (score, 0–5)
 Baseline 1.89 ± 0.93 2.91 ± 0.67 2.56 ± 1.42 2.00 ± 0.87 G*Albumin 5.89a 0.02
 Week 12 1.11 ± 0.93 3.33 ± 0.98 0.78 ± 0.97 2.78 ± 1.09 G*Albumin 1.74b 0.20
Kt/V urea
 Baseline 1.58 ± 0.18 1.69 ± 0.18 1.70 ± 0.20 1.64 ± 0.22 G*Albumin 0.09a 0.77
 Week 12 1.64 ± 0.25 1.70 ± 0.15 1.88 ± 0.32 1.56± 0.20 G*Albumin 5.64b 0.02 0.146 (0.41)
SPPB (0–12, score)
 Baseline 11.11 ± 0.93 9.42 ± 2.31 10.22 ± 1.56 11.00 ± 1.19 G*Albumin 3.87a 0.06
 Week 12 11.11 ± 0.67 9.83 ± 2.41 11.89 ± 0.33 9.67 ± 2.24 G*Albumin 0.51b 0.48
SMM (kg)
 Baseline 25.57 ± 3.85 24.03 ± 2.90 25.36 ± 5.83 24.71 ± 5.61 G*Albumin 0.03a 0.86
 Week 12 24.98 ± 4.40 22.59 ± 3.08 25.97 ± 5.49 23.94 ± 6.42 G*Albumin 0.22b 0.64
Body fat (%)
 Baseline 20.57 ± 7.18 21.51 ± 8.07 21.77 ± 8.86 23.14 ± 7.93 G*Albumin 0.0a 0.85
 Week 12 22.02 ± 8.32 22.66 ± 8.67 21.62 ± 7.84 26.04 ± 10.11 G*Albumin 0.30b 0.59
LLM (kg)
 Baseline 16.01 ± 2.09 14.85 ± 3.55 14.82 ± 4.90 13.23 ± 3.45 G*Albumin 0.03a 0.86
 Week 12 13.39 ± 2.34 12.36 ± 1.95 14.19 ± 3.81 12.73 ± 3.38 G*Albumin 0.34b 0.56
QoL, PCS
 Baseline 44.12 ± 6.29 43.18 ± 7.95 46.90 ± 6.74 46.28 ± 9.95 G*Albumin 0.22a 0.65
 Week 12 52.62 ± 4.76 41.47 ± 8.60 50.98 ± 4.37 44.54 ± 8.22 G*Albumin 0.01b 0.92
QoL, MCS
 Baseline 50.60 ± 12.20 48.08 ± 10.29 50.09 ± 10.49 52.11 ± 7.35 G*Albumin 0.65a 0.43
 Week 12 53.06 ± 6.96 48.92 ± 9.65 53.40 ± 10.43 49.00 ± 6.12 G*Albumin 0.18b 0.67

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

G, group (exercise vs. control); LLM, lower leg muscle mass; MCS, mental component summary; PCS, physical component summary; QoL, quality of life; SMM, skeletal muscle mass; SPPB, short physical performance battery. Kt/V: K = dialyzer’s capacity to clear urea at the blood flow rate, t = treatment time, and V = distribution volume of urea.

a F-score calculated using two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted by dialysis vintage at baseline;

b F-score calculated using two-way ANCOVA adjusted by dialysis vintage, and baseline frailty score at week 12.

Table 2.
Interaction effects between the intradialytic aerobic exercise and serum albumin level in the changes of frailty, dialysis adequacy, body composition parameters and QoL
Parameter Difference
Two-way ANCOVA
Albumin ≤ 3.8 g/dL (n = 21)
Albumin > 3.8 g/dL (n = 18)
Exercise group (n = 9) Control group (n = 12) Exercise group (n = 9) Control group (n = 9) Fa p η₂ (f)
Frailty (score, 0-5) –0.78 ± 0.11 0.42 ± 0.79 –1.78 ± 1.20 0.78 ± 0.83 Group 48.58 <0.001
Albumin 2.14 0.15
G*Albumin 1.74 0.20
Dialysis adequacy 0.06 ± 0.11 0.01 ± 0.13 0.18 ± 0.27 –0.08 ± 0.11 Group 6.92 0.01
(Kt/V urea) Albumin 0.08 0.78
G*Albumin 3.25 0.08
SPPB (0–12, score) 0.67 ± 1.00 0.42 ± 0.79 1.67 ± 1.41 –1.33 ± 2.06 Group 15.38 <0.001
Albumin 0.34 0.57
G*Albumin 4.14 0.05 0.111 (0.35)
SMM (kg) –0.59 ± 1.06 –1.43 ± 1.14 0.61 ± 3.07 –0.77 ± 1.60 Group 2.64 0.11
Albumin 2.21 0.15
G*Albumin 0.01 0.93
Body fat (%) 1.46 ± 3.24 1.15 ± 2.87 –0.14 ± 1.86 2.90 ± 3.55 Group 1.91 0.18
Albumin 0.00 0.99
G*Albumin 2.33 0.14
LLM (kg) –2.62 ± 1.24 –2.49 ± 2.90 –0.63 ± 2.84 –0.50 ± 1.26 Group 0.12 0.73
Albumin 6.46 0.02 0.164 (0.44)
G*Albumin 0.22 0.64
PCS 8.50 ± 6.46 –1.71 ± 11.18 4.08 ± 3.81 –1.73 ± 5.72 Group 3.52 0.07
Albumin 2.73 0.11
G*Albumin 0.14 0.71
MCS 2.46 ± 9.18 0.83 ± 10.89 3.31 ± 6.66 –3.11 ± 6.95 Group 1.49 0.23
Albumin 0.27 0.61
G*Albumin 0.29 0.59

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

G, group (exercise vs. control); LLM, lower leg muscle mass; MCS, mental component summary; PCS, physical component summary; QoL, quality of life; SMM, skeletal muscle mass; SPPB, short physical performance battery. Difference = value at the 12th week – value at baseline Kt/V. K = dialyzer’s capacity to clear urea at the blood flow rate, t = treatment time, and V = distribution volume of urea.

a F-score calculated using two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted by dialysis vintage and baseline frailty score.

References

1. Ekramzadeh M, Santoro D, Kopple JD. The effect of nutrition and exercise on body composition, exercise capacity, and physical functioning in advanced CKD PATIENTS. Nutrients 2022;14:2129.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Bakaloudi DR, Siargkas A, Poulia KA, Dounousi E, Chourdakis M. The effect of exercise on nutritional status and body composition in hemodialysis: a systematic review. Nutrients 2020;12:3071.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Piccoli GB, Lippi F, Fois A, et al. Intradialytic nutrition and hemodialysis prescriptions: a personalized stepwise approach. Nutrients 2020;12:785.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Kim S, Park HJ, Yang DH. An intradialytic aerobic exercise program ameliorates frailty and improves dialysis adequacy and quality of life among hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2022;41:462–472.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
5. Noguchi M, Yamaguchi S, Tanaka M, Koshino Y. Effect of intradialytic supine ergometer exercise on hemodialysis patients with different nutritional status. Phys Ther Res 2021;25:12–17.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Fouque D, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple J, et al. A proposed nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for protein-energy wasting in acute and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2008;73:391–398.
crossref pmid
7. Eriguchi R, Obi Y, Streja E, et al. Longitudinal associations among renal urea clearance-corrected normalized protein catabolic rate, serum albumin, and mortality in patients on hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;12:1109–1117.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kilpatrick RD, Kuwae N, et al. Revisiting mortality predictability of serum albumin in the dialysis population: time dependency, longitudinal changes and population-attributable fraction. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:1880–1888.
crossref pmid


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#301, (Miseung Bldg.) 23, Apgujenog-ro 30-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06022, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3486-8736    Fax: +82-2-3486-8737    E-mail: registry@ksn.or.kr                

Copyright © 2024 by The Korean Society of Nephrology.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer